Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access

Showing 191

Tools->Option->"OSLC Link Query" tab needs to be intuitive

It takes a lot of time to search for the right project when the list is so (which is , in our case). It would help us to win a lot of time if we had an option to search for the project and then choose it/select it.

Retire Rational Directory Server and move to a liberty auth server or other current authentication methods

Tivolli RDS is extermely old, difficulit to setup and has poor support available from IBM (it has taken over 6 months to work out how to get it to work in our environment because of the poor deloployment architecture of Tivolli RDS). Given that it...

ReqIF definintions and ReqIF IDs are NOT taken into account if archive and restore a project

After archiving a project and restore it in an another DOORS Database, the ReqIF Definitions are not included in the restored site. This means a loss of data and additional work when redefining the ReqIF Definitions.

introduce project/folder-scope history

when authorised users delete modules, there is no audit trace of their activity inside DOORS conscious of performance impact, we suggest an optional project/folder history to keep track of such transactions

Add support for Office 2019 in DOORS 9 and RMF

Office 2019 is now a nearly 5 year old version of the standard business office suite and DOORS and RMF should support it.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / Tools 0 Future consideration

Log Admin Activities Outside Of Modules To Comply With CMMC AC.3.017

CMMC AC.3.017 requires that Admin activities are logged. Things like changing settings that happen outside of a module context.
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / History/Audit 0 Future consideration

Implement an option which enables or disables the listing of modules and baselines in the tree view

We've experienced that the tree view is loading faster on our DOORS servers, if moudules and baselines are not shown.Our database is quite large and at least some people often navigate through the tree, which slows them down.It can be up to a few ...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / Performance 0 Future consideration

History note/entry for imported modules and objects via ReqIF

Till yet history for imported objects is empty. Expectation is an entry in Module history like: 'Created by ReqIF-Import via <RegIf-Definition-Name>. And the same in history in each imported object: 'Created by ReqIF-Import via <ReqIf-Def...

ReqIF option 'No locks. Exported data is read-only.' should instead read something like this: 'No locks. Update not possible'

The current option wording is misleading for customers. A ReqIf-Export without option to update exported date is something that is not the intention of primary function of ReqIF: See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Requirements_Interchange_Format "R...

Automatically disable accounts after 180 days of inactivity to comply with CMMC IA.3.086

CMMC finding IA.3.086 requires that accounts be terminated after 180 days of inactivity.
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / Configuration 0 Future consideration