IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 158

Expose renamed Execution state of Test Suite/cases in Engineering Test Management so that renamed Execution state can be used in Java Reporting Service

Currently, if you rename Execution state of Test cases and Test Suites in ETM, afterward, query these Test Cases/Test Suites from Java Reporting Service (JRS), still the default values of Execution state will be shown in the result of the query.
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Reporting 0 Future consideration

Include Test Script "Comments" (from the Manual Steps Section) when creating a JRS Report

When creating a Test Script report, it is possible to trace a relationship and include the "Attachment" section by using the following: QM Test Script -> Contains Test Script Step -> QM Test Script Step -> Attachment But there are no av...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management 1 Future consideration

In Execution Schedule, I would like to be able to change in-bulk all the Test Case Execution Records' machines

Currently, if you add multiple Test Case Execution Records (TCERs) to an Execution Schedule, you are able to modify the Machine individually. If I have hundreds of TCERs, I have to perform the same task hundred times. The idea is to have a simil...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 1 Future consideration

Add column to display Machine name in Test Execution

Having multiple adapters in the same machine is a supported scenario but, as a user, it is not possible to know which adapter was selected (or to confirm your selection was indeed applied). You are able to change the machine and in the popup wind...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

ETM Reconcile Improvement for named Test Case

Current Functionality When reconciling requirements in collections, test cases may be generated for requirements using the requirement name as the test case name. When using Link Validity, the test case is marked as suspect when the requirement na...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Formal Review comments should be able to responded to and closed an owner.

If a reviewer raised comments in a formal review there should be a way to resolve/reject the comments to alow the approver to make an informed decision. At the moment there is not way to determine if the comments are valid/resolved before approvin...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Need to be able to edit/delete Formal Review comments post save.

Once a reviewer has added a comment to a formal review there are not permissions available to allow the owner or admin to edit/delete comments. Suggest adding a permission for a role to be able to edit/delete comments in the formal review. Most li...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Test Step comments need to support more than 128 characters

When trying to enter comments against a test step it is limited in length. Ideally we would be able to attach multiple comments in RTF format or allowed to attach long text to capture comments from test step.
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Date autofill when state changes in Test case

In the Test case, there will be one custom date type field. so whenever the state gets changed to "Ready for Review, " the system date should be auto-updated in that custom field. Is there any possible way to do it?
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Integrations 0 Future consideration

Better Mail Configuration structure

Dear Jazz Team, currently there it is really confusing for users to configure Mail settings for ETM. There are two different ways for configuring mail settings: 1) In the profile of the user there is a mail configuration [1 - ETM_profile] In add...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.