IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 467

Views on Suspect Flags not possible

In Views, we would like to be able to filter on the state of selected link types (suspect, valid, invalid). Currently it is only possible to create a view filter on the existence or non-existence of links of selected link types. Use Case (one of m...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

DNG multiselection shall be kept after a modification

When selecting multiple artifacts and doing a bulk change the selection is unselected after the change is done. So for doing another bulk change all the requirements have to be selected again.Please change so that multiselection is kept after one ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to move artifact and module templates to a new DNG project without using a project template

Please provide an export / import feature that allows to copy artifact and module templates only. It is possible to copy artifact and module templates from one DNG project area to another, but only at the outset when applying the project template....
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Associate a workflow with a workflow

I want to give access to users to Edit State attribute (wokflow inside module) only if The module state (workflow related to the module) is in working state.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

Warn user when importing from spreadsheet to ERM when an attribute on the spreadsheet doesn't exist for artifact type

When importing a spreadsheet into RM which included a custom attribute type, the import finished successfully yet the custom field was not populated. I determined that the custom attribute was not attached to the artifact type, therefore the impor...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Moving of Requirements between Modules by maintaining the Links is not possible

The Links between Requirement (e.g. Derives To) are stored in the context of the containing Module.Unfortunately it is not possible to move a Requirement from one module to another by maintaining the links.You can only use the same Requirement (sa...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

Need a tool or feature to fix type system inconsistencies

LQE RB Reports don't resolve when RDF URI Conflicts exist within ELM Properties. During Report Creation Time, conflicts appear on the screen for report builders. These conflicts should never be allowed to coexist in the same ELM instance. No provi...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 1 Future consideration

DNG - Improve Data Exchange of tables using CSV/Excel files

we are facing an issue with exporting Data form DNG in CSV/Excel files, we are not able to export data containing tables that were inserted in DNG as RTF format from our Customer Specs.
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Review of a Change Set

Reviews are unnecessarily restricted from being performed on a change set. The tool should be able to provide a contextual review of a change set prior to delivery so that defects don't make it into a production stream.
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 1 Future consideration

Reports take a long time

For a review packet. Reports take a long time. Takes 20 min. Last day of sprint it is a long time to wait, especially if multiple modules at 20 min each it adds up.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Performance 2 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.