Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal
Hide about this portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 542 of 6262

Ability to change the icons for Execution States

We have some custom icons for out execution states, while we can change the name of the execution states, there is not a way to change the icons used for those states. We would like to request this in order to use our custom icons that make sense ...
about 2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 0 Future consideration

Public API to Update/Merge se-lected Artifacts in different Streams

For a variant management application, we would need a public API that allows to:- update selected artifacts or artifact types from a par-ent stream (trunk) in a second stream automatically.- add selected new artifacts or artifacts of a selected ty...
over 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Integrations 4 Not under consideration

Include a Keyword in an other Keyword

In RQM (ETM) 7.0.3, there isn't the ability to have a keyword put inside another keyword. Is this functionality now possible on a newer release or planned for a future release? It will be very useful.
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Setting External Variables (Test_Plan, Test_Suite, Test_Case) as Optional in RQM

Hi, I have 3 external variables: Test_Plan Test_Suite Test_Case Each uses the Configuration Metadata to provide a "Browse ..." button. The user now should only provide exactly ONE and the template than is based on that selection. RQM keeps saying ...
2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management 2 Future consideration

Provide Excel output when using a PUB (RPE) report in ETM

Currently, when we want to generate a document based on a RPE canevas that has been deployed in an ETM ressource, the only available outputs are PDF, Word, HTML, and XSL-FO. It would be very helpful to be able to choose the Excel output, as we can...
2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Reporting 0 Future consideration

Improve usability by adding "Find & Replace" for any (sub-)string in an attribute of any/all ETM artifacts

There is no function to find and replace a string in ETM. This is a basic user need.
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

Possibility of defining “Validated by” link constraints between ERM and ETM

See the screenshot "2024-07-09 12_34_01-Window.png". The QM Test Case 364 validate the RM artifacts 45130, 43907, 43390 and 43391 45130 is a "Heading" artifact 43907 is an "Information" artifact 43390 and 43391 are "Requirement" artifacts In our i...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 0 Future consideration

RQM does not have a way to view the Creator of a Build Record

To view who created a particular Build record for tracking purpose and also to ensure the audit.
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

OSLC links in ETM to DNG shall be gc configuration context sensitive

Hello dear IBM Team, this idea originates from my support ticket TS016025963 . My request is, that links between an ETM artifact and a DNG artifact are not visible in the ETM GUI if the user is not looking at the data within the proper configurati...
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 2 Not under consideration

"Previous Result Details" in TCER/TSER should modify

According to test engineers, the name "Previous Result Details" in TCER/TSER will cause mis-understanding, as they only tested once, and ignore this as it is previous result. Better to modify the name in TCER/TSER to avoid mis-leading.
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration