IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM

Showing 474

Links created between RMM elements and RM or QM artifacts created in one configuration should not be visible in all configurations that include the two objects.

Our team has found that when creating links between RMM model elements and RM or QM artifacts in a configuration in the context of a global configuration, these links are visible in all configurations that contain both objects. For configuration m...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Integrations and APIs 5 Not under consideration

User Documentation On Each Built-In Model Check

The Rhapsody User Documentation must include a section for each built-in Model Check specifying, Model element meta-class, to which it is applied, Any other condition, under which the model check is applied / not applied to a model element. The ex...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Rhapsody Client 1 Planned for future release

Allow connection between junction and choice pseudo states in Statecharts

Actually it is not possible to connect in a state chart a junction with a choice connector. To be conformant to SysML and UML this should be possible. E.g. the example as mentioned in UML specification https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/PDF on pag...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Rhapsody Client 1 Future consideration

64-bit version of the Green Hills adapter

We have enjoyed the integration of Rhapsody and Green Hills Integrity. We are surprised to hear that the new 64-bit Rhapsody 9.x version adapter for Green Hills Integrity is currently not supported. Green Hills does have an updated Multi/Integrity...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Integrations and APIs 1 Future consideration

Custom view to filter the elements inside a diagram

ustom view is not filtering the elements inside the diagrams. For example : If one diagram contains the attributes and on of the attribute does not qualify the filter then , customview cannot do that level of filter. In the same time , if there ar...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 2 Future consideration

Create an OSLC link from model element to baselined requirements in DOORS Classic from Rhapsody or RMM

As of now, we are able to create OSLC link from model element to baselined requirements in DOORS Next generation from Rhapsody or RMM using Global configuration context. But We would like to create an OSLC link from model element to baselined requ...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Rhapsody Client 1 Functionality already exists

Make transactions in STM more clear

Transitions in STM are not really clear. Can we make more space between Trigger and Guard or make them in different colors?
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Rhapsody Client 1 Future consideration

Display creator, creation date, modifier and modification date for diagrams and model elements

To better enable collaboration and configuration control of models.
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

Suggest to the Rhapsody user that they should deliver their work if they attempt to unlock a modified unit

Rhapsody is allowing an unlock without delivering the changes. Some people have made this error, which is causing differences and a need to merge. The users are then failing to do a merge properly, which requires repairs.
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

Suggest to the Rhapsody user that they should update the unit if they attempt to lock a unit that is not up to date

When a user locks a unit, Rhapsody is not forcing (or suggesting) the user to first update their model before locking. Many people are locking without updating the model, and this leads to conflicts because they are making updates on an older vers...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.