Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 917

Functionality or means to “rebase” a change set

DNG simply does not properly handle cases and what it is showing us not reflective of the actual content changed. From what we can gather, when two change sets (say CSA and CSB) are opened and then one is delivered (say CSA), the second change set...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Future consideration

Sort based on "modified By"

While it's possible to view the set of artifacts modified by individual associates it makes for a lot of filters and and saved views. It would be beneficial to be able to sort on "Modified By" as you can with such attributes as ID, Name, Type etc.
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

Glossary items in Excel export

When exporting to Excel then any embedded hyperlinks to the glossary are expressed in text rather than as an actionable URL/hyperlink. Export to Word is correct in that the hyperlink is correctly displayed as a URL.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Documentation 0 Not under consideration

RM Cloning permissions is need to be able to grant member 'Project Managers' , and 'Administrators'

Currently only Jazz Administrators can do the cloning function within Requirement Management application ; In a large organization with many large projects 'Project Administrators'/'Member-Administrator' tend to be more familiar with project data ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

Use same name for attribute everywhere

In some cases for system attributes in DNG, the attribute names are displayed differently, e.g. in the item detailed view as "Format" and in the column header as "Artifact Format".Request: Display all system attributes in the same way in the GUI e...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Apply the Module Content folder setting in project properties to ReqIF imports

This setting applies to modules created in DOORS Next, but misses out on the scenario of ReqIF imported modules, which are placed by default in the project root. It is not clear to customers that this setting does not apply to ReqIF imports and so...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

"Modified On" and "Modified by" value for modules reflecting also changes on artefacts inside this module

At the moment each artefact has a timestamp when it was last modified (value "Modified on") which is subject to actualisation when something was changed on or in the artefact. With modules however this value only changes when the module itself was...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Review Reports need Artifact in Module Comments

Review Reports need Artifact in the context of Module Review comments included.
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

Property to set tag's & view's description field size

We faced limitation of 449 symbols for tag's description field - in some cases it was not enough for us (eg. when we use tag's descriptions to store some technical information by extensions we develop). We'd like to have property (eg. in RM advanc...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

DNG change sets/streams should support SW-like development models

A standard, simple, typical development model in RTC would be to have a DEV stream and a PROD stream. In the DEV stream, people can essentially make any changes they want to. But to take those changes and move them to PROD, rules have to be follow...
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration