IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 960

In DNG, word .docx files preview not getting scaled upto proper visibility the way it is successfully in Doors.

Dear IBM, Users reported that the word document attached in the artifacts are not getting scaled in human readable size 'inside the Module' in artifact list. Also for 'maximizing artifact' the already available 4 options in the artifact pop-up is ...
about 2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow getLocksInDatabase(true) DXL Function to Return Lock Information for Locks on Items that the Current User Currently Has Open

The getLocksInDatabase(true) DXL function does not return lock information for locks on items that the current user currently has open. When I submitted the lack of this function as a bug, the assigned DOORS developer at IBM responded that it was ...
2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Improve ReqIF in DOORS Next

Hi Today, in DOORS Classic, when we use ReqIF to extract data, ReqIF enables the user to filter attributes to be included in the ReqIF. On DOORS Next side, this possibility does not exist. The request is : reconduct the same in ReqIF when we want ...
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 6 Not under consideration

DNG review session improvements

The current requirement review interface has some deficiencies when it comes to filtering artifacts based on comments. Currently, the user must manually scroll for artifacts with the comment indicator icon. The following would be appreciated: 1. W...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enhanced Link Explorer

Link Explorer is one directional dilsplay in default. It's better that have two directional display for seeing upper requirement and lower requirement relation immidiately. Please see the attached file. It's good for users to be able to change dis...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

ReqIf import: No hidden, non-alterable mapping tables which can mess up a project area

Overview, use case: We want to exchange requirements with a customer who uses DOORS Next, too. We have already set up a project area with the same requirements i.e. same artifacts and same attributes as our customer. Our customer modifies some of ...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Different history documentation in Change Set history and in artifact history

IBM case: TS017493161 According to the artifact history, the artifact A has been changed in the change set delivered. Ex: Verdict is cleared. In the change set history of the delivered change set the modification made is not completely described. ...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Audit trail for deleted artifacts

Deleted artifacts are gone with no trace they existed. Project History should log deletes, including ID, Name, user, and time of delete. This allows the distinction between artifacts that cannot be found vs artifacts deleted.
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 4 Not under consideration

Change "modified date" field when the artifact is delivered, or add a new "delivered date" field

Hello, The main purpose of this idea is to make the oslc query "oslc.where=dcterms:modified>=<<your_date>>^^xsd:datetime" more useful. I think the main usage of this query is to find the artifacts that were modified recently, or the...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 2 Future consideration

DOORS Next: Configuration of E-Mail Attributes for Comments on Artifacts

Current: At the moment an e-mail of a comment (discussion) looks like this: Subject: [ArtfaktType 123456] Artfiakt-Name-up-to-256-chars-or-advanced-setting-in-doorsnext-hiher-then-256-chars E-Mail: User-Name + again the Artifact-Name \n Comment-su...
11 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.