IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 466

Defect id should be a mandatory input for failed test case in RQM

Currently there is no request to provide the defect id/problem work item id to one test case in RQM that ends with Failed result. It should be implemented as one improvement for failed test case. Defect id or problem WI need to become a mandatory ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Documentation 0 Future consideration

Log name of the user who select the execution machine.

Each test case that will be executed through automation needs to have the machine selected before starting the execution, and we initiate the execution from the test suite. The history of the test case results displays information about the execut...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Documentation 0 Future consideration

Lock or freeze the ETM Local Stream

Currently, we are encountering an issue where the ETM stream is unintentionally changed or modified by users, leading to incorrect information being delivered. We may not be aware of such modifications. To prevent data corruption caused by users, ...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 0 Future consideration

find/replace for ETM test artifact titles

We have been able to use the ETM Excel Import Utility to change the title of test cases from a csv list view export of test cases. That requires minimal work in a config file to ensure all category, attribute values are defined, test script links ...
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Update Pre-Condition and Follow up Actions in ETM to allow Auto Archiving of Rejected Reviews

Quality Teams have been implementing the usage of Preconditions and Follow Up actions and have been using the "Archive approval groups after a state group transition" Follow-up action. This Follow Up action does archive "Rejected" approval groups,...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

RQM process/project template inheritance

RQM process inheritance issue summarized below which were discussed with Christophe Telep (RQM Product Manager): 1. For an enterprise client like MBDA, it is not feasible or scalable to manually run combinations of various copy utilities (RQM API,...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 2 Not under consideration

Allow to take over formal reviews together with the test case when accepting to another stream

Currently when accepting test cases to another stream from a baseline the formal reviews are not accepted as part of the test case. With current behavior it is challenging to convince our auditors that we reviewed our test cases and when and by wh...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 0 Future consideration

Test Suite Execution Order into Test Plan

The current random behavior while adding the existing Test Suite(s) with correspondent Test Case(s) into a Test Plan seems to not be the desired one.Unfortunately, the Execution Order inside of a Test Suite should be taken into consideration while...
11 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Update table properties

update table properties so that user can visualize in the "test cases" not only TCER Count but the actual ID and TCER
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 0 Future consideration

Enable possibilities to assign custom specific Categories and Attributes to specific roles

Current behavior: ETM does not provide the possibilities to assign custom categories or attributes to specific process roles. Requested behavior: ETM shall provide a mechanism to assign custom categories or attributes to specific process roles. Wi...
11 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.