IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 869

Should be able to prevent a Document Report to be run from a view

Some RPE report loaded on the DNG server are not meant to be run via the "Quick Print" In the MANIFEST.MF file if the Context: do not state "view" the report should not be available in the list of reports when doing "Generate report for a View".
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Parameter attributes when using "hover-over"

When showing the parameter artifact as "hover-over" the list of attributes looks un-sorted (may be alphabetically)Do we want a different, planned order of attributes for this view?How could this be achieved, e.g. by naming conventions of the attri...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 1 Not under consideration

Hide and view both for modules and folders

Hide and view of modules and folders data available in Rational DOORS is a very good feature which is very much required for the projects. It has to be incorporated in DOORS NG.
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Not under consideration

Tool Tip for Links inconsistent

In 7.0, the new Tool Tip for links in the selection menu for attributes to be displayed in columns is incorrect and inconsistently.It shows "Available on all Artifact Types", which is wrong, since, due to link restrictions, the corresponding links...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 2 Not under consideration

In DNG the menu item Apply Template selectable even if Template already applied

In DNG the menu item Apply Template selectable even if Template already applied, leading to an error message telling us that a template cannot be reapplied.In version 6.0.6.1, the menu item was not selectable in the first place.
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Ability to know when an artifact links changed

To be able to know what artifacts have been impacted since some date, whether it is attributes of the artifact or links that are established from and possibly to artifacts of interest.
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Update of Unit in Data Model fails

Update of Unit in CS Data Model 12 fails because data type was changed from pick to string.Change VED prototype manually and add as best practise to documentation that types should not be changed without change of RDF URI.Also, create IBM Case.
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 3 Not under consideration

Enhanced strategy for DNG cloning from one component to another

In dng we wanted to move artifacts from one DNG component to another one and used the clone and delete in original component feature. After adding the new component stream to GC we got the "same artifact in multiple components error" in GC. The is...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Not under consideration

Option to select a block of module to review

a. Reviewing a whole module is best as you see the individual artifacts for review within the scope of the documentb. Reviewing individual artifacts makes it difficult to review as we only see a single artifact at a time to comment.c. I would like...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Enhancements in DNG UI option when updating the artifact

Need below enhancement implementation on the UI capability in DNG 1) Low Affinity with MS Office application. Bad UI/capability of editing table on DNG.2) Changing the Table style UI is not user friendly.(e.g. Introduce the check box UI for Word-w...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 1 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.