IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 94 of 7045

    Changes (Nuc): Add ability to change/track changes to References/Drawings

    We currently have the ability to stage and execute changes to Fields and Specifications in Changes (Nuc). We would like the ability to do the same for Drawings and References (DOCLINKS) on Locations. We can solve this currently with automation scr...
    over 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Nuclear 1 Not under consideration

    Changes (Nuc): Add ability to change Parent/Children in LocHierarchy

    We currently have the ability to stage and execute changes on Fields and Specifications in Changes (Nuc). We would like the ability to stage changes to LocHierarch Parents and Children via the Changes (Nuc) application. As an example, we have a Sy...
    over 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Nuclear 1 Not under consideration

    Allow having more than one copy of the same Condition/Action on an LCO

    There are certain activities where we enter and exit the same action multiple times in a short period of time. These are all for the same activity. We currently have two options for dealing with this: Enter a different LCO for each entry/exit of t...
    over 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Nuclear 0 Future consideration

    Stage Actions in an LCO for LCO Execution

    Currently when an LCO is created and Tech Specs added, all Conditions and Actions of that Tech Spec are added to the LCO. This makes managing actions difficult when there are many Conditions and multiple actions per condition. For example: Our ins...
    over 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Nuclear 1 Future consideration

    Fix Impact Plan Status for Working Impacts generated from Template Impacts

    Currently there are two options for the status that working impacts can be generated in: Approved and Draft. We should have to option of specifying that Working Impacts generated from Template Impacts should be dependent on the Status of the Templ...
    over 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Nuclear 1 Not under consideration

    Create an LCO from a Work Order

    Many objects can be created from a work order, but LCOs are not one of those objects. Much work goes into preparing and impacting work orders that could be re-used for the generation of LCOs. Ideally there would be a new entry in the Selection Act...
    over 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Nuclear 1 Future consideration

    "Create Child Work Item" button on board cards consumes space

    New to 6.0.6.1, taskboard and Kanban board cards have a new "Create Child Work Item" button immediately below the header, which contains the work item ID and a pulldown menu. This extra button consumes valuable card real estate. Such incorporating...
    over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Planning 1 Future consideration

    Enhancement of user friendly in RTC Planning UI to easliy click "save" button

    When I change work items in a plan, I have to scroll all the way up to the head of the site in order to achieve the "Save" button. Atlassian Confluence shows a better way: after scrolling one or two lines up, the "Edit" button occurs and can be us...
    over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Planning 2 Not under consideration

    Plan snapshots should be based on plans, not plan views

    Currently, if you have Fetch Children on Demand selected, comparing the plan with a snapshot results in all the unfetched items to be reported as removed. This is counterintuitive, and it's effectively mixing the data layer (i.e. the plan) with th...
    over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Planning 1 Future consideration

    ICN[7679196] - RTC - User interface to keep the column headers and control button as a banner visible

    So, like RQM, keep the control widgets for the plan, visible while scrolling through the plan. For instance, the Save button, column headers on the plan, etc. Think Excel spreadsheet with the pane frozen.
    almost 8 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Planning 2 Not under consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.