IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

My ideas: Usability

Showing 238

RDNG- Add default users in "Directed to" field

Team, I am trying to find a solution to avoid clicking the “Select Users” button every time a new comment is added when I want a comment to be sent to the same list of individuals listed in the “Directed To” field. By default, when creating a new ...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Adding "Locked by Information" to Error Message ID CRRRWW7739E

In this error message is it not possible to see who locked the artifact. If you want to figure out who locked the artifact you are forced to leave your changeset. Therefore it would be great if the errormessage could display the name of the user l...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Display Embedded Artifacts in "Where Used"

In "Where Used" you can see if an artifact is used in Modules, included in reviews, etc. - but not if it is embedded in anther artifact! This means it can be included in sveral modules - and that is not displayed. This makes impact analysis go wrong.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

DNG : Standardizes the display of "In this module only" and "In all modules" links

In a DNG view, containing 'Satisfies', 'Justifies' links... the objects referenced by the 'In this module only' and 'In all modules' links are not displayed in the same way. This difference in presentation, especially for the "In all modules" lin...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Find review for a single requirement revision

If a single requirement (or a subset of requirements from a module) is assigned to a review,... 1) ... it is not visible in the requirements view of a module which requirement is assigned to which review. The review attribute is empty even if the ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to choose if document should be imported in rich text or plain text

When Doors identifies and extracts requirements within a document (Word, Open Office, rich text document) it should be possible to remove the rich text format so it is easy to create and manage RPE-templates without the rich text interfering with ...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Add capability to customize ‘default' comment targets within review and non-review.

This request is to add the ability to customize who is the default recipient on an artifact comment. There are a few ways this could be implemented, such as a default field on all artifacts that defines who comments are sent to (including a field ...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Filter on Unresolved Comments

The author/moderator should be able to filter/sort on which comments have not yet been resolved in order make sure that all concerns have been addressed. This capability should be available in both during a review and while editing the module. Thi...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Review Participants Check

Participants can be added to review without permission/license to participate in review. When a Review is being set up, the creator who adds multiple people to the review does not know if a user is archived or if the user even has permissions to p...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Ability to filter in DNG views based on the linked artifacts

Provide ability to filter in DNG views based on the attributes of the linked artifacts which belong to a different project area.
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.