IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 242

Add capability to customize ‘default' comment targets within review and non-review.

This request is to add the ability to customize who is the default recipient on an artifact comment. There are a few ways this could be implemented, such as a default field on all artifacts that defines who comments are sent to (including a field ...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Filter on Unresolved Comments

The author/moderator should be able to filter/sort on which comments have not yet been resolved in order make sure that all concerns have been addressed. This capability should be available in both during a review and while editing the module. Thi...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Ability to choose if document should be imported in rich text or plain text

When Doors identifies and extracts requirements within a document (Word, Open Office, rich text document) it should be possible to remove the rich text format so it is easy to create and manage RPE-templates without the rich text interfering with ...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Review Participants Check

Participants can be added to review without permission/license to participate in review. When a Review is being set up, the creator who adds multiple people to the review does not know if a user is archived or if the user even has permissions to p...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Ability to filter in DNG views based on the linked artifacts

Provide ability to filter in DNG views based on the attributes of the linked artifacts which belong to a different project area.
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

This is NOT about custom view settings!!! ERM's non-customizable Default View Should Accommodate 7 digits for the ID column

This is NOT about custom view settings!!! ERM's non-customizable Default View Should Accommodate 7 digits for the ID column. Our artifact IDs have reached 7 digits. The default Module view is not editable, you cannot change the width of columns, a...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

DNG reviews Rest API namespace - needs to include artifact comment creation date and parent/child relationship

When generating a report the comments are in the wrong order (that is also the case with the provided review report). We cannot use the provided date, because that is the latest modified date and not the creation date. That cause, in some cases, t...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Provide the capability "Duplicate and Replace" for embedded artifacts.

When requirement artifacts with embedded artifacts are duplicated (e.g. duplicate a module with option "duplicate all artifacts"), there is no way to duplicate also the embedded artifact. What we want is a functionality similar to the function "Co...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DNG default filtering on Primary Contents Attribute

DNG's default filtering mechanism does not allow filtering on the Primary Contents attribute. Currently this is only achievable by filtering on the Name, but that attribute is smaller than the Primary Content attribute, and some programs (like ACE...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

DNG Reviews shall better support the review of several chapters within a Module

We want to do a review of several chapters in a module. Use Case: This happens, for example, if the review shall only include a specific functionality, which is described in one or more chapters within a module. To select any single artefact in th...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.