IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 167

Ability to choose if document should be imported in rich text or plain text

When Doors identifies and extracts requirements within a document (Word, Open Office, rich text document) it should be possible to remove the rich text format so it is easy to create and manage RPE-templates without the rich text interfering with ...
12 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enhance the Compare Collection feature to provide a comparison of file contents

Please consider enhancing the Compare Collection feature to provide a comparison of the content of files that are different, instead of just the list of files that are different. This would be beneficial, as it would allow customers to use this fe...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Introducing an option to enable personal changesets

Current Situation: Every change set that is created is automatically created as shared. In other words, it is possible for several people to work within a change set. This general setting can lead to accidental changes/deliveries being made in thi...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow adding modules to modules

Allow adding modules to modules.Use Case: Creation of a Super Document consisting of different other subdocuments. These subdocuments are located in different folders and belong to different teams and therefore have different access permissions.In...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Show all Workflow States in same Column

Request: Show all Workflow States in same Column.Currently in Item or Module view, every workflow is shown in a different attribute / column.Artifact State is shown in different columns in module: For every workflow, there is an own column in DNG ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Apply the Module Content folder setting in project properties to ReqIF imports

This setting applies to modules created in DOORS Next, but misses out on the scenario of ReqIF imported modules, which are placed by default in the project root. It is not clear to customers that this setting does not apply to ReqIF imports and so...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

"Modified On" and "Modified by" value for modules reflecting also changes on artefacts inside this module

At the moment each artefact has a timestamp when it was last modified (value "Modified on") which is subject to actualisation when something was changed on or in the artefact. With modules however this value only changes when the module itself was...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RDNG comments are filled with default "Directed To"

In RDNG projects, the default comment attribute is filled with some default user ids. We wanted to remove those so the section are not pre-filled. Please help us a way to have the Directed to field as blank in RDNG comments.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Future consideration

DN is not able to filter for reviewed artifacts

In DN artifacts (simple and module) can be added to DN review, the assignment to the review is visible in column "Review", but the tool is not able to filter for this review column. Use Case: filter to ensure that all needed artifacts are part of ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Delivery of empty Change Set and directly discard it

When delivering an empty change set it should be possible to directly discard the change set. At the moment during CS delivery information is provided that CS is empty but there is no possibility to discard the CS immediately. The user needs to en...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.