IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 226 of 5127

Inform users of locked artifacts in wizard prior to ReqIF import as this causes errors

It makes a lot more sense to prevent the ReqIF import, than allowing it to occur and forcing the customer to redo the import. The wizard should show all the locks that will affect the import and then stop the import. Otherwise customers need to do...
3 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Submitted

Ability to manage and report on the Team Ownership data for a set of requirements in a Requirement Repository Project

Problem Statement: There is not a way to report, sort, or filter on a set of requirements by Team Ownership, in order to facilitate the updating of the Team Ownership data to control the access. Request: Provide an ability to manage Team Ownership...
3 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Submitted

Enhance the import function of reqif/reqifz in DOORS Next

When importing data into DOORS using a reqif format file, it is necessary to support attribute mapping operations on the UI interface. We need to be able to visually see the Property list in the source file and configure the mapping relationship b...
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 3 Future consideration

DN IBM feature request - improve usability of audit history

Current behavior: audit history in DN provides a detailed view and a huge amount of data, looking for the relevant information is difficult Requested change: improve analysis of history data, enable filtering for history data, like string search ,...
29 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

When comparing configurations in DOORS Next provide a way for the user to specifiy attributes to ignore. Also need an option to ignore white space.

It will be very helpful to be able to ignore attribures such as Last Modified and Status as well as ignoring white space differences.
2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DOORS Next: Configuration of E-Mail Attributes for Comments on Artifacts

Current: At the moment an e-mail of a comment (discussion) looks like this: Subject: [ArtfaktType 123456] Artfiakt-Name-up-to-256-chars-or-advanced-setting-in-doorsnext-hiher-then-256-chars E-Mail: User-Name + again the Artifact-Name \n Comment-su...
about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow selection of artifacts for review directly from within a module

Use case: Selection of artifacts for a reviewDetailed use case: Allow users to add artifacts to a review directly from within a module (limit review scope to a selected number of artifacts from a module) Current situation: add a complete module or...
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
24 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
24 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Needs more information

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
24 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Needs more information

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.