IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 270 of 5834

Save report into a DOORS Next folder if you are working in a Baseline.

There is no possibility to save a Report in a folder in DOORS when I open a Baseline, It should be possible to Save a Report in a folder even if I open a Baseline.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Advanced ReqIF Import tagging feature should include some way to identify affected modules

Advanced ReqIF import offers a nice feature that tags artifacts that already exist in the modules in the target environment, but that are not present in the incoming modules from the ReqIF package. However, the only way to determine which modules ...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Attribute Data Types "Date" doesn't provide us with FULL month, it only provides a abbreviation now

we need to a way to display full month to meet our document standard
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RM.Data.createLink Operation result codes and message need to be more detailed

Client extension API for the Requirements Management (RM) application https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Main/RMExtensionsAPI6061 When calling RM.Data.createLink and the link already exist, the API return simply an error Would be useful if the messag...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Support “allow only certain types of artifacts in a given module type”

User assigned the wrong artifact type to an artifact. Examples: assigned a module type to a file artifact; put a Test Case artifact in a Requirement Spec. PMR Reference "TS008869697" 1) Disallow putting a module-type artifact inside a module. 2...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Incoming links from other applications to DNG should create an entry in the audit history

There is an inconsistency in how DOORS Next Generation records backlinks (incoming links) in its audit history. Scenario 1: In a non-CM enabled project, where it is associated to some other project in, for example EWM, and where a link is created ...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Reviews and Review Reports do not show the Approval/Review Status per user for each artifact.

The Reviews and Review Reports do not show the Approval/Review status from each Approver/Reviewer per artifact in the Reviews. In terms of the Review Report, this is important information to have as a record outside of DOORS Next. All we can see i...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Multi Edit of Comments-Attribute in DNX

Enable possibility to multi-edit the Comments-Attribute in DNX. Use Case: - A requirements engineer has to comment on a set of requirements [same comment] for a given variant (pvRestriction). - A bunch of artifacts has comments in 'Open State', b...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Changing workflow-state in the grid is too dangerous

When you change the workflow-state of an artifact in the grid, the mouse click is written in stone. This is too dangerous! If you are not "Pixel-Perfect", you are damned.
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Remove links box needs to expand to show which module the artifact is in or provide rich text hover with the info.

When removing links using the pencil in a linking column, a user should be able to see which module they originated (if they are even in a module). The box for removing links is not resizable if the characters of the linked text is longer than wha...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.