Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 95

We need a Find and Replace All that works in one instance, not one-by-one processing

This was an RFE back in Feb. 2017 (RFE 113153). It was closed in April 2021 and not added as a planned work item. After discussing a defect with the Find/Replace with IBM support in an open case, the issue of having to click on the Replace button ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Update the Where Used for better review location

This request is for enhanced functionality for the Where Used property of artifacts, as shown in the right-hand panel. Since reviews can include both artifacts and modules, our users have difficulty keeping track of the various reviews that have t...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Display (Archived) for users in DNG

In some portion of the tool, the word (Archived) is appended to the end of an archived users name, making it very clear to the user that the person is no longer part of the project. We'd like to see this displayed everywhere that a username occurs...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

DNG review: Artefact IDs are not shown in comments table in review report.

The current DNG review report has two tables:1. The mapping of artefact names to artefact IDs.2. The comment table. (2) uses the artefact name from (1) as the identification for the comments. This should be changed to the artefact ID. Rational: Wh...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

GC link enhancement for compare configuration GUI

When linking between artifacts in different components using a global configuration, the compare configuration GUI currently says "The target of the link is not in the configuration". However, as of version 7.0.2 some of the behavior around links ...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Multiple changesets mixed in diff

History view does not separate change sets so the changes can be interleaved, thus making it hard to see just the changes for a particular change set.
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Top level quick view does not always show differences

Not easy to tell what link was removedTrying to map module to component doesn't show and Quick Search fails.Ideally would be similar to the module view where can bring up the detailsLinks do not show in high level view Top level view shows there a...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration