Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal
Hide about this portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 199

Undo Function

An Undo Function similar to CTRL-Z in Office Applications is requested. Missing undo functionality for recent edit steps, especially for unintentional changes by “clicking and typing somewhere” in the req. definition or in another attribute in com...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DOORS Next: Configuration of E-Mail Attributes for Comments on Artifacts

Current: At the moment an e-mail of a comment (discussion) looks like this: Subject: [ArtfaktType 123456] Artfiakt-Name-up-to-256-chars-or-advanced-setting-in-doorsnext-hiher-then-256-chars E-Mail: User-Name + again the Artifact-Name \n Comment-su...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Please display artifacts in module "Reviews" and "Collections" columns

Many customers operate with modules and therefore use the module view very frequently. They would like to see artifacts under review displayed in the module "Reviews" column. And they would like to see related collections displayed in the module "...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow selecting all dependencies to be ignored

Current behavior: When a user accepts a Change Set from other stream, a list of dependent CS is provided. The user can select which CS to ignore, one by one. This action is very time consuming, if there are many dependencies and the user wants to ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DNG review session improvements

The current requirement review interface has some deficiencies when it comes to filtering artifacts based on comments. Currently, the user must manually scroll for artifacts with the comment indicator icon. The following would be appreciated: 1. W...
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Provide an indicator in review comment list to identify the artifacts for which comment(s) have been answered/responded

It takes VERY long to open each requirement one by one, which are part of review to check if there is a reply to a comment.
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Warn the user when duplicate artifact is added to the module

Currently, users are allowed to use same artifacts in one module which are duplicate entries and causes confusion for other users. It would be really useful if we get a warning message when the user is trying to add an artifact which is already ex...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Restrict ERM Review Comments to Active/Open Reviews

Since DNG supports both Comments and Review Comments separately, the Review Comments should be restricted to the Open and Active Review. Turns out Review Comments can be added any time and by anybody without restriction. The Open Review is the pla...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Provide some "working mode" options on PA Level as they are usually defined for the complete PA

1) work in module Many customers are working nearly only with requirements that are used in modules. The usual default behaviour is nevertheless still showing core artifacts. Please add a configuration option (on PA Level) where the PA admin or co...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow to send email to user who Locked Artifact from UI directly

If artifact is locked, new user needs to check who locked it and separately compose email to user and ask unlocking. Proposal is to allow sending email directly from "Artifact is locked" massage in UI. Similar function is in Doors Classic 9.0
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration