IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 95

Compare and work of/with changes is bad

After a re-import i tried to find out which changes occur. I looked for this in the change set and start to deliver - after clicking step by step i come to the overview that i can see the dedicated occured changes --> 532changes.The issue here ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 3 Not under consideration

No Revisions shown in Baseline History

When working in the context of a baseline, the module history shows no revisions, not even the ones older than the current baseline.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Missing Feature: Select all Artifacts on Page

Missing Feature: Select all Artifacts seen on PageCurrently, you have to select 1st artifact, scroll down, then shift select last artifact.Basix usability issue.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Larger Section for History in DNG

When viewing the artifact history page in DNG, the portion of the screen that is devoted to actual artifact history is too small. Suggested improvement is to reduce the height of the header section of this page to allow the history section to be l...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Text search behaviour for look-up terms ('Glossary Items') for short expressions

The search function for look-up terms (Ctrl + Space) within DNG contains since version 7.0 of DNG the new "feature" to not indexing short words like 'the', 'is', ...See: https://jazz.net/jazz03/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/1396...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Requirement artefacts' last modified to be updated when link is modified

When a DNG artefacts' link is changed (like satisfaction link), the last modified date of the artefact is not updated. This needs to be updated.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 7 Not under consideration

Export multiple modules of a component inside RDNG project to Word or PDF

Dear IBM, We are looking for options to export multiple modules of a component to work or PDF.Now we are doing module by module and then merge those documents into single document.This has become a big productivity drainer for users.For example if...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Allow multiedit of artifacts to set row type in module view

Allow multiedit of artifacts to set row type (numbered row, normal row) in module view.Use Case: Since the normal multiedit is restricted to 200 artifacts (and we often have that case, for example after migration of documents bulk adaptations are ...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

DOORS Next generation comments have opacity filter below 1 making the reading process very difficult for visually impaired us

DOORS Next generation resolved comments in artifacts have opacity filter below 1 making the reading process very difficult for visually impaired users. IBM is working on how to best represent this information in an accessible way but meanwhile the...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Module Pencil Menue "Set as heading or Content" shall modify artifact type and format according to artifact type definition

Today one can use the comand to change headings into text or requirements. It is a nice way to work, but it is impossible to change an artifact into a diagram, becase the format is not changed. If a user tries to do this, they will create miss-mat...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.