IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 278

Make the common permission properties editable in 1 location

User Permission change to Attributes at the Project Level for Multi-Component Projects User defined permissions to artifacts and attributes are managed at the Project scope till Configuration Enabled then at the Stream scope per component. When pr...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Functional Safety Baseline Integrity Assurance

ELM could be used in support of Functional Safety Development Applications but only after qualifying the system and its Enterprise usage to 3rd Party Certification Body. As this comes at great expense to the ELM Customer and having just received t...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 3 Future consideration

Indicator for existing links of any kind

Having an indicator attribute that shows the existence of any link is much faster than checking the artifacts links section in the sidebar or creating a filter for any possible link. Also OSLC links to RMM and ETM and other external links shall be...
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

More finely grained application of Roles and Permissions for artifacts and associated attributes to protect content from "unauthorized" editing.

This would allow the protection of specific content in DNG to the benefit of the team members working in the tool. Protection of "Content" and attributes from inadvertant (or intentional) changes by "unauthorized" team members by role would be des...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Attribute Type for Rich Text missing

Attribute Type String Rich Text requested for DNG. Reasons: - A requirement has many attributes, some of them are text (string) attributes. Some of these also need to be able to contain tables and images, for example the attribute "Translation of ...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Provide some "working mode" options on PA Level as they are usually defined for the complete PA

1) work in module Many customers are working nearly only with requirements that are used in modules. The usual default behaviour is nevertheless still showing core artifacts. Please add a configuration option (on PA Level) where the PA admin or co...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Remind users if a Change Set (CS) is older than one week and not delivered yet

Current behavior: Currently a lot of change sets are created by users but forgotten that they are open or not found any more, since it's not known how to find them.Finally we have a lot of old CS also containing changes no one knows if they are st...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enhance tool to allow filtering based on attributes of linked artifacts

Doors Next does not offer sufficient filtering capabilities. Filtering displays only attributes available in current RM component, but not attributes available in linked RM components. To have the possibility to search and display a full picture o...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Export Compare Configuration for specific Module or Change Set

The 7.0.2 release includes a compare configuration report, which looks super promising. Does this report give the ability to only export a give module? The options appear to only include as specific as Artifacts, which I imagine includes all artif...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Composite Delivery Change Set - Editable Name

When delivering Change Sets from one stream to another, a Composite Delivery Change Set is create that contains the list of Change Set that were Delivered. The name of that Composite Delivery Change Set is of that pattern: "Composite Delivery from...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.