Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 5972 of 5972

Shipment Receiving and Issues and Transfers should both have the ability to select the query as has been provided for Inventory Receiving

It is likely that many clients will have multiple Maximo storerooms in the same physical storeroom, therefore binding in the Default Storeroom on the user's profile could be useful for some clients, but where there are multiple storerooms, multipl...
about 1 year ago in IBM MAS - Mobile 2 Future consideration

Ability to allow table domains in the Inspection forms in Maximo to be selected by users

It will be great help to select the table domains line Assets/ Locations or any other table domains in the inspection forms. This is also helpful if we can select more than one value in this.
about 1 year ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) 0 Planned for future release

Update the Where Used for better review location

This request is for enhanced functionality for the Where Used property of artifacts, as shown in the right-hand panel. Since reviews can include both artifacts and modules, our users have difficulty keeping track of the various reviews that have t...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Display (Archived) for users in DNG

In some portion of the tool, the word (Archived) is appended to the end of an archived users name, making it very clear to the user that the person is no longer part of the project. We'd like to see this displayed everywhere that a username occurs...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

DORS NG shall allow restoring of deleted data from Artifact audit history

DOORS NG shall have a working functionality to restore the deleted data from the Module Audit History.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Not under consideration

Make event arguments visible in the project browser

We cannot find the arguments of an event in the project browser, so that it is pretty hard to add allocation kind of dependency between such arguments and other elements. It would be great help for engineers if such event arguments are visible in ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

Allow cloning even with conflicts

Currently the cloning feature is not useful as is; what is needed is he ability to clone without the many conflicts blocking progress and making the use of the feature not feasible.
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Request to add fields on Test Execution record or Test Execution Result Record

We are trying to track time spent on our executions and on the browse test case execution page there is no column option for total run time but there is for time spent. There is no time spent field in the execution record results display but there...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 5 Not under consideration

Implement Compaction/reindex for JTS Index

We just recognized our JTS Index has grown to > 500 GB which caused performance issues when executing Backup of Indices.After executing reindex the size was just 2.5 GB.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Foundation/Common Services / Administration 2 Not under consideration

Make available an excel/csv emission factor download

This is used by the client, their reporting partners, and auditors to easily validate that the emissions being used in Envizi are as per required emission factors for the reporting period. There are no restrictions in the availability of the Austr...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Envizi - ESG Suite / Scope 1&2 GHG Accounting & Reporting 1 Planned for future release