Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 464

Functionality or means to “rebase” a change set

DNG simply does not properly handle cases and what it is showing us not reflective of the actual content changed. From what we can gather, when two change sets (say CSA and CSB) are opened and then one is delivered (say CSA), the second change set...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Future consideration

Apply the Module Content folder setting in project properties to ReqIF imports

This setting applies to modules created in DOORS Next, but misses out on the scenario of ReqIF imported modules, which are placed by default in the project root. It is not clear to customers that this setting does not apply to ReqIF imports and so...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Property to set tag's & view's description field size

We faced limitation of 449 symbols for tag's description field - in some cases it was not enough for us (eg. when we use tag's descriptions to store some technical information by extensions we develop). We'd like to have property (eg. in RM advanc...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

DN is not able to filter for reviewed artifacts

In DN artifacts (simple and module) can be added to DN review, the assignment to the review is visible in column "Review", but the tool is not able to filter for this review column. Use Case: filter to ensure that all needed artifacts are part of ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Delivery of empty Change Set and directly discard it

When delivering an empty change set it should be possible to directly discard the change set. At the moment during CS delivery information is provided that CS is empty but there is no possibility to discard the CS immediately. The user needs to en...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RDNG comments are filled with default "Directed To"

In RDNG projects, the default comment attribute is filled with some default user ids. We wanted to remove those so the section are not pre-filled. Please help us a way to have the Directed to field as blank in RDNG comments.
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Future consideration

Provide capability for additional Content-like attributes that allow HTML, tables, and file attachments

Sometimes the Content attribute can become burdened with a lot of content. We request that you provide the capability for additional Content-like attributes in a module that allow for HTML, tables, and file attachments.
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

ReqIF import should not delete enum values without warning as it could cause data loss

If you import a ReqIF package that has a different list of values for a particular enumerated attribute, that list replaces the existing list in the component (for GC-enabled components at least). Any values that are not in the incoming package ar...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Unassigned 0 Future consideration

Add Change Set Discard Permission Level

Change set Permission is limited to Delivery only. When 2 different roles are involved in change set management, there is no way to distinguish permission between the roles. The need is to have 2 roles, Author role to create and Configuration Lead...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Create a tag in base artifact while in module

When assigning a tag in DOORS NEXT, it would be great if there was a radio box so you can choose to create the tag in the base artifact, and/or the module. Module tags cannot be searched across modules, so most of the time people will prefer to us...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration