IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

My ideas: IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 405

Inserting images and arrays in richtext atributes in DOORS Next

With DOORS Next today, we can add images in the main attribute (content) of requirement artifacts because it is of richtext type. But there is no richtext type available (like in DOORS classic). Projects need to enrich their specification modules ...
11 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Provide feedback while exporting or import CSV-file from within a view menu

Exporting or import CSV file from within a view menu does not provide 'feedback of progress' or an indication that the job is still active. Users are advising that they cannot figure if the job has completed or just failed. The issue is causing fr...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Review managing and administration

When we conduct a review, for example a collection of requirements relating to performance, in person during a meeting, in the presence of performance specialists, the participants in this review are either reviewer or validator.To secure this rev...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

DOORS Next: Configuration of E-Mail Attributes for Comments on Artifacts

Current: At the moment an e-mail of a comment (discussion) looks like this: Subject: [ArtfaktType 123456] Artfiakt-Name-up-to-256-chars-or-advanced-setting-in-doorsnext-hiher-then-256-chars E-Mail: User-Name + again the Artifact-Name \n Comment-su...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Better, more consistent, understandable name for filter "Limit by lifecycle status"

The filter name "Limit by lifecycle status" is very unfortunate. The naming style is totally inconsistent with all the other filter names such as "Artifact type", "Modified by" or "<some_attribute_name>". All these other filter names describ...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

links are not following the data model after change of artifact type

Observed behavior: I figured out that there is a link “Derived from” from a Requirement in one PA to an Information in another PA, which is not supported by the data model. (limited by a defined Linked Constraint) Steps to reproduce: Initially, th...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

ReqIf import: No hidden, non-alterable mapping tables which can mess up a project area

Overview, use case: We want to exchange requirements with a customer who uses DOORS Next, too. We have already set up a project area with the same requirements i.e. same artifacts and same attributes as our customer. Our customer modifies some of ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Allow selecting all dependencies to be ignored

Current behavior: When a user accepts a Change Set from other stream, a list of dependent CS is provided. The user can select which CS to ignore, one by one. This action is very time consuming, if there are many dependencies and the user wants to ...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Define validation rules for attributes / data types

Validation rules contribute to the requirement quality by ensuring that requirement attributes are filled out correctly and consistent. There are several possibilites to enrich the validation possibilites in Doors Next (right now only boundaries f...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Define required attributes for specified type + workflow state for an artifact type

Analogous to IBM EWM (Precondition: Required value for type and state) it would be very useful if there is a possibility to create rules to ensure that if the artifact reaches a specific state in a workflow, a value for an attribute is set by the ...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.