IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

My ideas

Showing 5744

Need granular permissions to delete user's own artifacts in a change set without an explicit 'delete artifact' permissions

There should be some kind of granular permissions to allow an user to delete their own artifacts in a change set with having an explicit permissions to 'delete artifact' permission.
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 5 Not under consideration

Renaming Inspection form in Work Center after approving

The Inspection Form can only be renamed as long as it is in status "DRAFT". I think it should be possible to change the name - cause it's only a description" at all time by creating a revision.
over 2 years ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) 1 Future consideration

Add a check to warn the user to not delete an TC/TCER/TER if it was part of a not deleted TSER or Test Suite Result

I have encountered several instances where users, who "updated" a test suite with a new TC and then deleted the old one caused prior Test Suite Results to become "corrupt" as they lost TC result records. This also caused problems in reporting.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow a user without Edit DXL power to view the DXL associated with a Layout DXL column.

A user can use a view that was created by someone else. And in that view there may be a Layout DXL column. But if the user does not have Edit DXL power then the user cannot even see the DXL associated with the associated column. It is a problem th...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / Access Controls 0 Future consideration

TRIRIGA - Lack of accurate vacant seat identification.

Space Mgmt can't accurately identify multiple seats in a space.
about 11 years ago in IBM TRIRIGA Space Management 3 Planned for future release

Threaded style review comments

Under Formal Review section for Test Plans or Test Cases, please add the possibility to reply or comment in a threaded style on review comments by other team members (similar to what is available in DOORS Next reviews). This would make the review ...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Protect DNG against "brute force"

DOORS Next Generation 6.* when used with Websphere Liberty Profile integrated with our LDAP can not be protected against "brute force". Only solution is to modify our LDAP to control it ... but this is not allowed as per corporate policy.Request i...
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Foundation/Common Services / Administration 3 Future consideration

Add National Language Support for Danish to EWM client for input to fields that require z/os member names

In the Enterprise "Data Set Definition" editor, it is not possible to enter national characters in the "Member" field. This prevents creating a translator, which is executing a program with "special" characters. For example it is not possible to c...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Enterprise Extensions 1 Planned for future release

Hide ACM Actions and Attributes for Asset not managed as configuration managed (CM).

Some attributes and actions in Asset (CM) application should be shown only if the asset is not managed with configuration managed (CM). but in our case, many attributes and actions exist in the main tab of Asset (CM) and the More Actions section w...
almost 3 years ago in IBM MAS - ACM 1 Functionality already exists

Multi Edit of Comments-Attribute in DNX

Enable possibility to multi-edit the Comments-Attribute in DNX. Use Case: - A requirements engineer has to comment on a set of requirements [same comment] for a given variant (pvRestriction). - A bunch of artifacts has comments in 'Open State', b...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.