IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 523

Test Result shall document a snapshot of the complete content of the related test artifacts (e.g., Test Case, Test Script,..) when it was executed

Current situation:In a Test Result only a subset of the content visible in Test Case is documented (e.g. Content of field "Test Case Design" of Test Case won't be visible in a Test Result) The Test Result artifact provide a reference to the used T...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Option to select and delete those Test Cases without Requirements during the reconciliation process

We observed QM Reconcile Requirements is not working as expected in 11P . Steps to Reproduce 1.In RM we have saved a shared view with a certain attribute selected as a filtering optionIn this view, we have now 10 requirements that are added to a T...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 1 Not under consideration

ETM REST API to list available fields for test artifacts

There should be a REST API to list available fields for each test artifact. Here is the customers description from a support case " I need an Rest API which gives me the list of fields available in any test artifact, i.e., test plan having title, ...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Unassigned 1 Future consideration

Requirement to maintain Incrementing prefix pattern in RQM post migration from DOORS CLASSIC

Our unique ID solution for RQM is currently lacking, especially compared to what DOORS Classic was capable of. This impacts our ability to migrate projects that previously had test cases stored in DOORS Classic. DC allowed for a prefix to be assig...
almost 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 2 Not under consideration

As a user I would like to be able to Merge Streams that has locked artifacts by being prompted to override the lock

If you try to merge a Stream that has locked artifacts, the merge will fail because the locked items cannot be updated. The solution to that is to unlock the artifact and redo the merge. But if you have several different artifacts that are locked,...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

TC selection based on TC attributes during TSER creation

While generating a Test suite execution record, A filter has to be introduced where Test cases can be chosen based on Test Case attributes using the filter.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Test cases naming in ETM limit of characters

Test cases naming in ETM it’s limited to only 250 characters. This limit shall be increased. This is a major issue for the testing tools which create names larger than 250 characters, based on the parameters used in the test case definition.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Request to add fields on Test Execution record or Test Execution Result Record

We are trying to track time spent on our executions and on the browse test case execution page there is no column option for total run time but there is for time spent. There is no time spent field in the execution record results display but there...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 5 Not under consideration

Defect id should be a mandatory input for failed test case in RQM

Currently there is no request to provide the defect id/problem work item id to one test case in RQM that ends with Failed result. It should be implemented as one improvement for failed test case. Defect id or problem WI need to become a mandatory ...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Documentation 0 Future consideration

ETM XL Import Server-side pre-checks

When users inadvertently make mistakes in excel importer configuration file or data, this results in creation of duplicate attributes and enumeration values in target ETM component type system. There are no warnings or alerts that type system is g...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Excel & Word Import 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.