IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 513

Ability to duplicate the test artifacts when duplicating the test plan

Problem: When we duplicate the test plan, currently it has the option to link to the original artifacts that the original test plan links to. We are looking for an option to duplicate the test artifacts as well, when the test plan is duplicated. W...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 2 Not under consideration

Ability to distinguish and compare the changes in the version of the test plan

Problem Statement: Ability to distinguish and compare the changes in the version of the test plan. Ability to add Tags/Comments to these versions Problem: The version in the test plan (any test artifact) is captured whenever a test plan is saved. ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 2 Not under consideration

Reviews and Approvals for Keywords

Our team has noticed that there is no Review/Approval process in place for Keywords. Keywords are used throughout Test Scripts as part of a manual execution of a test. If changes can be made to a Keyword without requiring review and approval in th...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Not under consideration

As a user I would like to be able to Merge Streams that has locked artifacts by being prompted to override the lock

If you try to merge a Stream that has locked artifacts, the merge will fail because the locked items cannot be updated. The solution to that is to unlock the artifact and redo the merge. But if you have several different artifacts that are locked,...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

Test Builder view for a Test Suite

Project Teams in our company are utilizing Test Suites to group Test Cases that are all using one Test Procedure. The step is that they have one Test Case to one Test Script and all the Test Cases are assigned to one Test Suite. When running the T...
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 4 Not under consideration

Defect id should be a mandatory input for failed test case in RQM

Currently there is no request to provide the defect id/problem work item id to one test case in RQM that ends with Failed result. It should be implemented as one improvement for failed test case. Defect id or problem WI need to become a mandatory ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Documentation 0 Future consideration

Capability to choose the output format (f.e. docm instead of doc)

Our customer is generating custom reports from ETM. The report generation is working okey, but when the report is exported from ETM, the output format is always doc. When converting the base dotm to doc, due to the compatibility problems of this f...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Documentation 0 Future consideration

Linking Test Script Step Results to Requirement using Public APIs

We can link from Test Script Steps to Requirements. When execution, the Web UI shows the link from Test Script Step Result to requirement (as defined in the test script step). It is not possible to create those links manually or via any public API...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Requirement to maintain Incrementing prefix pattern in RQM post migration from DOORS CLASSIC

Our unique ID solution for RQM is currently lacking, especially compared to what DOORS Classic was capable of. This impacts our ability to migrate projects that previously had test cases stored in DOORS Classic. DC allowed for a prefix to be assig...
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 2 Not under consideration

Copy ALL Test Results between project areas

When copying a Test Plan with Test Case Results all TCER and all TC Results need to be copied over; not JUST most recent ones.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Performance 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.