IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 523

Provide option in "Duplicate" feature to not add "Copy of" in front of artifacts copied to the target that have the same name as existing artifacts

We want to duplicate test suites to another project area, such that the test suite and none of the included artifacts are prefixed with "Copy of" when the name is not unique.We are spending a lot of time manually removing the prefix. Could you add...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Defect id should be a mandatory input for failed test case in RQM

Currently there is no request to provide the defect id/problem work item id to one test case in RQM that ends with Failed result. It should be implemented as one improvement for failed test case. Defect id or problem WI need to become a mandatory ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Documentation 0 Future consideration

Enhance a test case's Requirements Links section in the diff/merge window to display all linked requirements (differences & Non-changed items)

Enhance a test case's Requirements Links section in the diff/merge window to allow the user to display all linked requirements (differences & Non-changed items). Ideally this enhancement would provide the following functionality in the diff/me...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 0 Future consideration

Add immutable requirement links to the test case results that exist at time of execution

Any requirement linked to the test case or the test script would be automatically added to the "Requirement Links" section on the test case results, when the result is created. When creating a test case result, QM would check if requirements are l...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Integrations 0 Future consideration

Provide the ability to create an ETM baseline from a previous moment in time

The ability to create a historical baseline was introduced in DOORS Next 7.1, and it was an Easter egg in an earlier release in DOORS Next. This same functionality is needed in ETM. In addition, the ability to create the historical baseline should...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 0 Future consideration

Request to add fields on Test Execution record or Test Execution Result Record

We are trying to track time spent on our executions and on the browse test case execution page there is no column option for total run time but there is for time spent. There is no time spent field in the execution record results display but there...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 5 Not under consideration

Support sort, filter and group by on roll up validity for test case

The test development team needs to be able to easily see all of the test cases in the plan that have Suspect test case Validity Summary, so they can quickly step through each Suspect test case, updating the link validity value to either Valid or I...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

The OSLC Cleaner does not report state ID in report

Links between ETM and DN often require manual manipulation to maintain the consistency between them. The OSLC cleaner was developed to correct such scenarios, however, the output of the tool does not allow for an administrator or user to validate ...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Column configuration for test case overview giving only limited selections

When configuring the test case overview in a test plan all the categories and attributes can be selected as a column: [Computergenerierter Alternativtext: Test Plans 2534: Test Plan Sections Summary Test Objectives Test Plan Scope ABK Demo 02 safe...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

As a User, I would like to be given an option to copy more Test Case Results instead of just the latest

Right now, when copying a Test Plan with TCERs and Test Case Results, the application can only copy the last result. That, many of the times, can be sufficient, but we would like to be given an option to copy more than just the last result (maybe ...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.