IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 967 of 6079

More finely grained application of Roles and Permissions for artifacts and associated attributes to protect content from "unauthorized" editing.

This would allow the protection of specific content in DNG to the benefit of the team members working in the tool. Protection of "Content" and attributes from inadvertant (or intentional) changes by "unauthorized" team members by role would be des...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Implement feature to configure customized length of fields in ERM Rich Hover Pop-Ups

Hi Team, We have received requirement from ELM users that they want to customize the length of fields which is displayed in the pop-up windows when pointing the mouse on any Artifact ID in ERM. They want to display more than the default characters...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Bulk deletion of cross application links

Hello team, The enhancement idea is to have the feature to bulk delete the links from selected artifacts. The cross application of deletion of links is currently not possible in bulk.
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

DNG LQE Report don't have "Modified By" attribute

DNG LQE Report is not showing “Modified By” attribute. We are able to see “Modified By” attribute in DNG UI under requirement attribute type but the same attribute is not available in LQE report. DNG UI: LQE Report:Not able to find “Modified By” a...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Export Compare Configuration for specific Module or Change Set

The 7.0.2 release includes a compare configuration report, which looks super promising. Does this report give the ability to only export a give module? The options appear to only include as specific as Artifacts, which I imagine includes all artif...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

The default selection for the Comments priority shall be configurable by admin and/or user.

We have to write a lot of Comments that are High Priority, because any comment is usually for a Requirement that needs attention. It's easier to have the Comment default to High Priority. It would be nice to have the ability to change this at the ...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Restricting Access at Stream Level

Current RM access regulation is only possible at project level, or at a team level. There should be a way to restrict access at stream level. When we want to restrict users to work/edit only on their respective stream and not the Master stream, th...
almost 7 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 5 Future consideration

Need API to Manage DNG Type System

For deployments that involve more than 1 DNG server (associated with the same JTS server) that have the same type system, managing the type system is a currently a nightmare. The Need: An API that can be used to completely manage the DNG type syst...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

Add merge feature for Change Set deliveries which includes modification of attribute and artifact type properties to prevent destructive behaviour

Problem The change set in the source stream contains adding an attribute to an artifact type. While delivering the change, the artifact type configuration of the target child stream is overwritten and stream specific attributes are disconnected fr...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Include attributes behind the link to Excel Export from View

When Artifact has Link to another Artifact, it is possible to define up to 5 attributes behind the Linked artifact be visible in the View. If user saves the selections as View, and makes Excel Export, the attributes behind the link are not in the ...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.