IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 932

Functionality or means to “rebase” a change set

DNG simply does not properly handle cases and what it is showing us not reflective of the actual content changed. From what we can gather, when two change sets (say CSA and CSB) are opened and then one is delivered (say CSA), the second change set...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Future consideration

Review Reports need Artifact in Module Comments

Review Reports need Artifact in the context of Module Review comments included.
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

DNG change sets/streams should support SW-like development models

A standard, simple, typical development model in RTC would be to have a DEV stream and a PROD stream. In the DEV stream, people can essentially make any changes they want to. But to take those changes and move them to PROD, rules have to be follow...
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

Update permission model

In current permission model, adding/removing and replacing a configuration are tied to same permission. If someone has the permission to replace a configuration, s/he has permission to add/remove a configuration. Permission to replace and add/remo...
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Documentation 3 Not under consideration

Apply the Module Content folder setting in project properties to ReqIF imports

This setting applies to modules created in DOORS Next, but misses out on the scenario of ReqIF imported modules, which are placed by default in the project root. It is not clear to customers that this setting does not apply to ReqIF imports and so...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Property to set tag's & view's description field size

We faced limitation of 449 symbols for tag's description field - in some cases it was not enough for us (eg. when we use tag's descriptions to store some technical information by extensions we develop). We'd like to have property (eg. in RM advanc...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

DOORS NG shall have an option to restore the deleted data

DOORS NG shall have an option to restore/undelete the deleted data for the requirements authors/composers.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Transfer/replicate artefact tags between contexts (base/module)

We use tags to denote how a requirement may be classified when an attribute is not available or required. During development, teams can collaborate using tags to categorise requirements. For context, tags are often added to the requirement in a mo...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Not under consideration

Cannot create from Rhapsody a remote artifact in DOORS Next inside a Module

Use Case: Create Requirement in DNG Module from Rhapsody Client Problem:Currently its not possible to select a DNG Module while creating a requirement from the Rhapsody Client See attachment for the steps
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 2 Not under consideration

RM Cloning permissions is need to be able to grant member 'Project Managers' , and 'Administrators'

Currently only Jazz Administrators can do the cloning function within Requirement Management application ; In a large organization with many large projects 'Project Administrators'/'Member-Administrator' tend to be more familiar with project data ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.