This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
This would be a very useful RFE to deliver.
The raiser makes a very valid point about users not providing the right details and it being hard to identify the JVM just from the user information.
Please ensure that this information is always presented. The user must NOT have to click on any button/link to display the extra information - they will forget and the effort will be completely wasted.
Extending it to include the node name
==
Please extend the RFE further and include the node name. This is particularly important where the system is using multiple servers and the same JVM name is being used on different servers.
Technote 1446387 describes the situation where JVMs have been setup on mutiple servers without defining the mxe.name value
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21446387
"Note: If this parameter is not used, each physical server will have its own unique names so the result can be multiple servers named MXServer and MXServerc1 etc. This method should be used in conjunction with the deployment of the RMI Registry (rmireg.war): "
Security concern over node name
--
I know that some installations are very security conscious so they would be concerned about the node name (or more likely the IP address) being shared on these screens.
This could be overcome by creating a cached system property that controls if the node name/IP address is included in the text.
It should be ENABLED by default as most installations I have worked with wowuld not object to the node name/IP address being shared if it sped up fault investigations. Users may have the node name/IP but they don't have a port number so they can't make a direct connection.
There must be a clear note in the installation documentation about changing this value if the system administrator doesn't want this information made available.
Value to organisations using Maximo
--
This would be a very useful change to make to the framework. I appreciate that this would be in a central part of the Maximo code so there could be some reluctance to deliver it.
I have talked about the importance of providing the time/userID/node/JVM details in my blog here.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/importance-serverjvm-select-correct-logs-analyse-call-mark-robbins
The information in that blog article can also help justify why this should be implemented.
The other articles in the call details mini series explain about the other values (date & time/userID/node/JVM).
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/maximo-support-advice-from-non-ibm-engineer-article-mark-robbins/ - scroll to the "Call Details mini-series" section.
Happy to discuss this privately with IBM Dev if people want more information on the value of this.