IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 268

Cannot prevent changes during review period

Somewhat a symptom of not having in-tool review. Cannot prevent changes subsequent to review/approval but prior to delivery of a change set. Change set state is either open or delivered. No "Under review-don't make changes" state. Since have to do...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

Can't see just your own differences between changesets

Can't see just your own differences between change sets. Mixed in with everyone's diffs. Very confusing to see just your own diffs and get misleading visualizations so that now have to dive into each to confirm if real changes or not.Difficulty wi...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Primary text functionality and mapping is not clear

Primary Text functionality and mapping needs to be clear. Currently for Requirements artifact, we use "Title" for "Requirement Name", and "Description" for "Requirement Description". So the use of "Primary Text" is not clear. To make the situation...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DN - filter for "limit lifecycle status" can not be applied in linked artifacts

When applying a filter for linked artifacts I am not able to add another filter for existing OSLC links like "limit lifecycle status". This will be mandatory to be able to use e.g. the connection to workflow items for release assignment. Use case:...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enable Filtering in Views from Attributes of Linked Artifacts

We would like to be able to filter a view in the UI based on a value (or portion) of a linked artifact. Sorting would also be nice. The importance of this is that it's apparently possible in DOORS 9.6 & we keep getting bludgeoned by DOORS fans...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RDNG- Add default users in "Directed to" field

Team, I am trying to find a solution to avoid clicking the “Select Users” button every time a new comment is added when I want a comment to be sent to the same list of individuals listed in the “Directed To” field. By default, when creating a new ...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

Reviews column shold be sorteble and filterble

"Reviewes" is a field one can display in Artifacts and Modules, but it is not included in filters and sort. I want to find all artifacts not included in a review Now one have to export to excel and sort there...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Display Embedded Artifacts in "Where Used"

In "Where Used" you can see if an artifact is used in Modules, included in reviews, etc. - but not if it is embedded in anther artifact! This means it can be included in sveral modules - and that is not displayed. This makes impact analysis go wrong.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

Add capability to customize ‘default' comment targets within review and non-review.

This request is to add the ability to customize who is the default recipient on an artifact comment. There are a few ways this could be implemented, such as a default field on all artifacts that defines who comments are sent to (including a field ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Automatic glossary detection after import

After importing a new artifact or module containing multiple artifacts then the user currently has to perform multiple searches in order to add, or link multiple glossary items. Surely this could be automated to highlight matched existing glossary...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.