IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 270

Reviews column shold be sorteble and filterble

"Reviewes" is a field one can display in Artifacts and Modules, but it is not included in filters and sort. I want to find all artifacts not included in a review Now one have to export to excel and sort there...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Add capability to customize ‘default' comment targets within review and non-review.

This request is to add the ability to customize who is the default recipient on an artifact comment. There are a few ways this could be implemented, such as a default field on all artifacts that defines who comments are sent to (including a field ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Filter on Unresolved Comments

The author/moderator should be able to filter/sort on which comments have not yet been resolved in order make sure that all concerns have been addressed. This capability should be available in both during a review and while editing the module. Thi...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

DNG : Standardizes the display of "In this module only" and "In all modules" links

In a DNG view, containing 'Satisfies', 'Justifies' links... the objects referenced by the 'In this module only' and 'In all modules' links are not displayed in the same way. This difference in presentation, especially for the "In all modules" lin...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Review Participants Check

Participants can be added to review without permission/license to participate in review. When a Review is being set up, the creator who adds multiple people to the review does not know if a user is archived or if the user even has permissions to p...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Ability to filter in DNG views based on the linked artifacts

Provide ability to filter in DNG views based on the attributes of the linked artifacts which belong to a different project area.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

DN Export of links with their format of attributes

Hello, Exporting the links within a module with their attributes its not possible. Can you please check and let me know if this could be implemented? (see picture in the attachment)
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

This is NOT about custom view settings!!! ERM's non-customizable Default View Should Accommodate 7 digits for the ID column

This is NOT about custom view settings!!! ERM's non-customizable Default View Should Accommodate 7 digits for the ID column. Our artifact IDs have reached 7 digits. The default Module view is not editable, you cannot change the width of columns, a...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Automatic glossary detection after import

After importing a new artifact or module containing multiple artifacts then the user currently has to perform multiple searches in order to add, or link multiple glossary items. Surely this could be automated to highlight matched existing glossary...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow users to specify in ReqIF export modules whose contents have changed since a previous baseline

This is helpful for customers who frequently export 100s of modules in ReqIFs. These customers need to reduce the size of ReqIF files to improve import performance. The problem is in choosing modules to include in exported ReqIFs. It usually takes...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.