IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 385 of 7037

    Enhance the import function of reqif/reqifz in DOORS Next

    When importing data into DOORS using a reqif format file, it is necessary to support attribute mapping operations on the UI interface. We need to be able to visually see the Property list in the source file and configure the mapping relationship b...
    over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 4 Future consideration

    Add an option for admins to set standard templates for artifact creation by users

    This option would enable users to automatically work with predefined content for artifact types, e.g.: pre filled gapped sentences to support writing requirements pre formatted text (other than standard format for "content"), saving formatting tim...
    9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    If new artifact is created inside Change Set, and it is linked using Global Configuration Personal Stream, it should not show similar way as links to deleted Artifacts

    Currently there is ambiguous view in DNG with links. Linked artifact inside non-delivered CS and link to deleted Artifact is shown the same way, leading to confusion. Prerequisites: Clobal Configuration Stream, with 2 RM Components and some link e...
    about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Under review

    Add filter selection IS to filtering

    Currently there is no IS option in filtering. This means that if there is multiselection enum attribute with values a, b, c.. and Artifact 1 has value a, Artifact 2 has values a, b and Artifact 3 has values a,b,c -> user is not able to filter i...
    about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    Attributes not initialized when artifact type changed

    This is a follow up of TS016553250 & TS016553250 The change in artifact type from "Information" to "Requirement" does not Initialize the attributes. This is not the case with "Heading" to "Requirement" Because of this, Users missed out many ...
    about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    Workflow state of a requirement should imapct the link validity status

    In Version 7.1, when an artifact’s Workflow state is updated, Link Validity is no longer affected. We would like IBM to consider reverting this functionality to its previous behavior, where changes to the Workflow state did impact Link Validity. S...
    2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

    Display progress bar while exporting data from Module

    When we export the data from Module in either csv/xls/xlsx, it just gives a message saying "The export operation has started. The process might take a considerable amount of time, depending on how many requirements are being exported." So, the use...
    over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    in modules prevent base artifact linking via project admin setting

    In the system engineering all customers working in DNG with in the module mode. The default requirement engineer works inside a module and is not aware of the background settings in DNG, eg the artifacts are stored in a module folder and there is ...
    almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 4 Future consideration

    Solve bug when changing artifact type in a view from heading

    When creating an artifact, if there is the artifact type attribute in the view, we can modify the type directly in the column. When changing to or from a heading type, there is a bug : when changing from a heading to a non-heading type, the artefa...
    8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    Ability to scroll with a mousse wheel within the Module Explorer widget

    Users request to be able to scroll within the module explorer widget. When several levels are expanded the user has to click on the scroll bar to locate the heading he is looking for, which is not very practical. This would be a great improvement ...
    9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.