IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 268

Resizing of inserted artifacts in order to see better the added information

When we are working with requirements, if we insert artifact 1 within artifact 2, artifact 1 is very small and it is hard to see the details (see Inserted artifact.png). If there could be any way to resize the inserted artifact 1 (image, diagram f...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Delivery behavior for change set after changes by multiple users

Use case:Working in parallel with multiple users in one change set.For delivery the last change will always set to the user who delivered the change set.So in audit history it is not always clear who did the change because the time of delivery is ...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Remove "Elaborates / Elaborated By" and "Specifies / Specified By" from users view

The link types "Elaborates / Elaborated By" and "Specifies / Specified By" seem to be related to an old integration between the RM application and UNICOM Focal Point, as far as I understood from the support. They cannot be edited and used for othe...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Unique handling of links in filter 'Link changes' during delivery and comparison

This is related to TS016372244 and TS016488144. Feedback from IBM Development Team, and it is working as designed: "As we know, when a user creates an incoming link in Component A from Component B, that link is stored in Component B. In my tests, ...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Improve the search/replace feature in Find/Go To

As a user, with the Find/Go To feature in DOORS Next, we want to be able to: - Search in all or selected attributes - Search by regular expression - Search next - Replace then search next - Replace all This feature enhancement will help our users ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Include a filter in the "comments" widget, used in the project areas dashboards.

In the project areas' dashboards in RDNG, Serpro (IBM costumer) uses the widget "Comments" and suggests the inclusion of one more filter for the comments inserted in this widget. In the "Comments" widget we have these 3 native filters: - Recen...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Indicate which Reviews are waiting on Done

It would be useful to show an indication that a review reached 100% Completion, as this would indicate that someone within the review finished but forgot to click Done. Currently, we must search manually for these reviews as the tool does not indi...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Include an option to export artifact comments for an entire module.

This request is to have comments associated with an artifact be exportable into csv export. Ideally, this would include comments from all instances (see RFE # https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=150915). There...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Include all instances of comments for an artifact

Include the option in the comment right-hand panel to include or exclude comments based on location (module, base, or review). Potentially, this could be expanded to include comments from other streams as well. Note that the review comments should...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Make reports available as filters

It's usefull since we are using reports to check for open or inconsitent requiremements. It would be helpfull to work directly on the affected requirements in DNG
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.