IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 5739 of 5739

Inspection Forms Should be able to take a Higher Volume of Questions

We currently have a business case for a Vehicle Inspection that uses the inspection form to create a form that required around 2000 questions and answers in different permutations. Currently the system struggles when creating or amending a from du...
almost 2 years ago in IBM MAS - Mobile 0 Planned for future release

Rhapsody context pattern with parts and values

Hello Team, I'm trying to get the value property and its value using context pattern for parts which are typed with block. Steps to reproduce : 1. Define a block with 2 ValueProperties (Image_1) 2. Define a part of type “block” (Image_2) 3. Assign...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Functionality already exists

Command for ignoring white space in RTC

As we have an option to ignore white space in eclipse and visual studio clients during comparing file in RTC source control, expecting an option for the same using command-line interface. The SCM teams automated the merge operations using the comm...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Source Control 1 Future consideration

PreCondition Set in "Require Workitem Approval" does not detect changerequest linked from another EWM server

Expectation: I want to allow delivery of RMM Changeset only when a linked ChangeRequest are Approved Note : ChangeRequest should be part of another EWM Server Problem: Cannot deliver changeset linked to Approved Change Request from another associa...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management 2 Future consideration

Need Reply & Resolve comment option for Formal review comment

Customer id: 0746108Reference PMR: TS001735013 Our customers initiate reviews under Test Plan formal review section in RQM For a comment we don't have reply option in RQM. As of now Every comment/reply are added as new comment.Also there is also n...
almost 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Execution variable names in Test Script should not be editable

An old defect was opened and closed as won't fix: https://jazz.net/jazz02/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/37609 We would like to know if the technology today allows that to be implemented. The idea is to prevent Execution Variable...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Unassigned 1 Is a defect

Establish a field like the discussion field also for other elements like review comments

The discussion field is used to document user entries with a specific time stamp. This functionality is also helpful for other use cases, e.g. to store review findings or something else. But unfortunately the discussion field can only be used once...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Work Items 2 Future consideration

Problems during Build Synchronization in RTC Clinet and Jenkins

There are build synchronization inconsistencies Observed in various cases that are confusing to users. Detailed use cases & it's expected results are attached in the file.
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Build 2 Future consideration

Add the ability to change column configuration (left to right / top to bottom) display settings when performing a comprehensive export of a test plan.

This feature would make comprehensive exports of test plans much more aesthetically pleasing to the viewer. The current export stacks the step columns in the Top to Bottom view, while we develop and execute our procedures using the Left to Right v...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Unassigned 0 Future consideration

"Select a Machine to run this test" dialog shows no machines for commandline Adapter

As per the business use-case, we are trying to add the test script in the test suite directly and run against the test cases added in the test suite of a test plan. Test script what is created is a command line adapter type. Issue here is we are u...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management 1 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.