IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 532

Defects filtering into Test Case Execution Records

Hello, The main goal of the idea is to help our colleagues to filter easily for the defects that have been linked or not to the TCER (which contains valid/invalid Test Result(s)). Usage scenario: from release to release, it's quite hard to find wh...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Reviews and Approvals for Keywords

Our team has noticed that there is no Review/Approval process in place for Keywords. Keywords are used throughout Test Scripts as part of a manual execution of a test. If changes can be made to a Keyword without requiring review and approval in th...
almost 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Test Builder view for a Test Suite

Project Teams in our company are utilizing Test Suites to group Test Cases that are all using one Test Procedure. The step is that they have one Test Case to one Test Script and all the Test Cases are assigned to one Test Suite. When running the T...
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 4 Not under consideration

Update Pre-Condition and Follow up Actions in ETM to allow Auto Archiving of Rejected Reviews

Quality Teams have been implementing the usage of Preconditions and Follow Up actions and have been using the "Archive approval groups after a state group transition" Follow-up action. This Follow Up action does archive "Rejected" approval groups,...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

Ability to add Test cases from different Component / Project to a single Test Plan

Here idea is to re-use the Test cases instead of copying them to each component / Project. Some Common Test cases that are related to "Brakes and tail lamps" should be part of one Test Plan ; Note: Brakes and Tail Lamps are two different project a...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management 0 Future consideration

As a Admin, I would like to add a Project Area Property to prevent the Execution Owner to be automatically assigned

Currently, when you add a Test Case to the Test Suite, if the Test Case has an owner assigned, the Test Case automatically sets the Execution Owner to the same user. There is a Project Property that does something similar, but for TCERs and TSERs:...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Requirement to maintain Incrementing prefix pattern in RQM post migration from DOORS CLASSIC

Our unique ID solution for RQM is currently lacking, especially compared to what DOORS Classic was capable of. This impacts our ability to migrate projects that previously had test cases stored in DOORS Classic. DC allowed for a prefix to be assig...
almost 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 2 Not under consideration

As a User, I would like to be able to automatically/programatically set Attributes and Custom Categories for automated tests

Right now the automated tests need to be manually updated after the result is created, so that the Custom Categories and Attributes are correctly filled. The workaround used is to add to the tests a job that runs after a few seconds after the test...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Test Result shall document a snapshot of the complete content of the related test artifacts (e.g., Test Case, Test Script,..) when it was executed

Current situation:In a Test Result only a subset of the content visible in Test Case is documented (e.g. Content of field "Test Case Design" of Test Case won't be visible in a Test Result) The Test Result artifact provide a reference to the used T...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Request to add fields on Test Execution record or Test Execution Result Record

We are trying to track time spent on our executions and on the browse test case execution page there is no column option for total run time but there is for time spent. There is no time spent field in the execution record results display but there...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 5 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.