IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 931

Round-Tripping with Word

It seems that a tool that is intended to control change management should allow for changed source material. Customers provide their documents in other mediums than just ReqIf (and Excel is unacceptable). The tool should be able to find difference...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Not under consideration

Ability to choose if document should be imported in rich text or plain text

When Doors identifies and extracts requirements within a document (Word, Open Office, rich text document) it should be possible to remove the rich text format so it is easy to create and manage RPE-templates without the rich text interfering with ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enhancement request following defect 137626 to allow ReqIF Export wizard to advise the export was successful but ended with w

Enhancement request following defect 137626 to allow ReqIF Export wizard to advise the export was successful but ended with warnings due to NPE errors. At present, the ReqIF Export wizard advises users that the export was successful but only revie...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Allow disabling of "Directed to: automatic filling in comments.

Using the 'module view' the comment 'attribute' is added to a view and it is saved as part of the view. When the comment attribute is hovered over (next to an artifact) and then create comment is selected, before anything is entered the "Directed ...
about 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 4 Not under consideration

Importing and representing OLE files from DOORS to DNG in 7.0.1

The new approach to import ResIF frile from Doors to DGN makes all ReqIF embedded objects, like icons, images and Excel tables, (all of which we receive a lot of) to be previewed overlaid on an A4 size page, which causes them to shrink and to have...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 1 Not under consideration

Module level artifacts do not have term references stored in OSLC or Reportable API

Currently term references are stored in core artifacts and there is no way to store them in the module level artifacts. It would be good to be able to have a way to decide where we would like the link to be stored in. The steps to fetch term refer...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Integrations 0 Not under consideration

Enhance the Compare Collection feature to provide a comparison of file contents

Please consider enhancing the Compare Collection feature to provide a comparison of the content of files that are different, instead of just the list of files that are different. This would be beneficial, as it would allow customers to use this fe...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Hyperlink Data Type

You can use the 'string' data type to create an attribute and put a URL in the field, but it is not a traversable hyperlink. I would like the ability to create a custom attribute that can be populated with a traversable hyperlink.
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Introducing an option to enable personal changesets

Current Situation: Every change set that is created is automatically created as shared. In other words, it is possible for several people to work within a change set. This general setting can lead to accidental changes/deliveries being made in thi...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RMM should contribute to the system defined DOORS Next field "Validity Summary"

The IBM Rhapsody® Model Manager (RMM or AM) application provides link validity status information only. Validity summary information is not available in DOORS Next.This breaks the assumption that ASPICE consistency can be achieved by referring to ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Integrations 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.