IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 513

Share "Manage Project Properties" from a master project

All settings done in "Manage project Properties" is not inherited when you share a process of a project area.
almost 7 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Not under consideration

RQM API Publish

RQM API does not have the same level of fine grain control as RTC. RQM API is not published. The RTC OSLC API has allowed our company's developers to build solutions for Export Control capabilities, customize solutions for manipulating links betwe...
almost 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Integrations 5 Not under consideration

Link ETM to timeline from EWM

Link ETM to timeline from EWM rather than forcing an independent timeline in ETM to be created
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

As a Admin, I would like to add a Project Area Property to prevent the Execution Owner to be automatically assigned

Currently, when you add a Test Case to the Test Suite, if the Test Case has an owner assigned, the Test Case automatically sets the Execution Owner to the same user. There is a Project Property that does something similar, but for TCERs and TSERs:...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Formal Review/approval on a testcase need to also update testScript state

Use case : Approval trackings is configured in way like : Approval created/pending : State 0 => State 1 Approval approved : State 1 => State 3 Approval rejected : State 1 => State 4 Testcase and TestScript use same workflow Manually chang...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Implement the Summary's Description filter on the "Browse > Test Cases" view of a QM project

Today, on the project's "Browse > Test Cases" view, we can add the "Description" column, which correspond to the Summary's Description field. We cannot filter this field by keyword. As seen in the case TS009260451, the following tools do not an...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 4 Future consideration

RQMCopyUtility: copy data from/to 2 disjointed servers

the tool currently developped needs to access both servers at the same time. Goal is to manage to use it to copy on servers that can't be reacheable at the same time
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Integrations 2 Not under consideration

Include in the artefact history the version/baseline information

Current situation: The artefact history does not include any version/baseline information and it is difficult to track modifications based on a version of an artefact; only possible by checking the Modified date. Required situation/Proposal: The a...
11 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

As a User, I would like to be able to automatically/programatically set Attributes and Custom Categories for automated tests

Right now the automated tests need to be manually updated after the result is created, so that the Custom Categories and Attributes are correctly filled. The workaround used is to add to the tests a job that runs after a few seconds after the test...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Allow ETM (and potentially EWM) to reference DNG Terms so projects (via a GC) can have a single repository of terms/acronyms etc

Currently projects invest in creating DOORS Next collections of terms, acronyms and reference documents (all DOORS Next glossary terms). The functionality to type and use control Space to lookup already defined terms is incredibly useful with DOOR...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Integrations 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.