This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Users are looking for more granularity when it comes to non-materiality – Users would like to be able ‘shade-out’ or tag specific data points as non-material so that they can see in the platform what data they need to report within each individual ESRS topic and sub-topic, and what data they don’t need to report. The outputs of Double Materiality Assessments go down to a data point level of granularity, so they would like to see that reflected within Envizi's SRM.
This would enable users to clearly see what individual data points they need report against within topics - rather than all the data points associated with each ESRS topic – which may not all be material. They see this as better ‘gap-analysis’ capabilities, as they can see ‘real’ gaps, rather than just datapoints they know they don’t need to report.
Idea priority | High |
Needed By | Quarter |
IBM Wide Managed Tags: Ideas | Market: EMEA - UKI, Market: EMEA - NCEE |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Hi Ross! This March we are releasing our current support for double materiality, which will include being able to capture materiality at the topic level and question level. We have built this based on our continuous review and validation of ESRS requirements for double materiality.
We will continue to monitor demand for this feature and assess how it fits into our long-term development plans to continually support users in their reporting journey, specifically with double materiality. That said, we completely acknowledge that users want to have some workflow within SRM at the data point level and not just at the question level.
Hi Ross! Thanks for this idea. At the moment what we've released is the ability to tag impact & financial materiality scores at the question level (DR in ESRS) as requirements to disclose ESRS is generally at the question/DR level (based on EFRAG ESRS Q&A Document released Nov 2024). We are keeping in mind users' preference to know materiality at the data point level, however building workflows and tags at the level of a field in an SRM questions requires significant technical investment. We will look to see different avenues where this need can be met.