IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Administration

As an Admin, I would like my users to not be asked "Would you like to copy requirements from the new added test scripts to this test case?" when link synchronization between Test Cases and Test Script Steps is enabled

Problem: Enable the following: 1) "Copy requirement links to test case from test script steps when child test script is added"2) "Synchronize requirement links from test script steps to test case when test script is saved" Admins expect that the a...
26 days ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Submitted

Order of subcategories

Current Status: If custom categories for artifacts (test cases, test plans etc) are created, one can change the order of appearance by moving single categories up or down in the list of categories. Subcategories however cannot be changed in their ...
about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Submitted

Allow Configurable Category Value Length in ETM

In ETM, there is no native concept of folders to organize artifacts such as Test Cases. A common workaround is to use Categories to simulate a folder structure by creating hierarchical category values. Ideally, this would be handled through true m...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Future consideration

Ability to change the icons for Execution States

We have some custom icons for out execution states, while we can change the name of the execution states, there is not a way to change the icons used for those states. We would like to request this in order to use our custom icons that make sense ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Future consideration

ETM Project Property Compare

In Enterprise Deployments it is critical to keep track and check up on Project Properties, especially to ensure that any dependencies are effectively managed. Performing ETM Project Property Compare in Bulk across the Enterprise can expose both co...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Future consideration

ETM Project Copy (include Environment Variables)

ETM Project Setup and refinement is extremely time intensive. Thus, when a project finally gets all the tune ups included it is beyond valuable to copy all of it including its Environment Variables (Part of Lab Resources) to one or more Server to ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Future consideration

ETM Project Property Propagation

As an ETM Project Administrator of tens of ETM Projects, the introduction of a new property useful to many active project areas to amend is highly valuable. ETM Projects while designed to work in isolation actually work better in concert and consi...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Future consideration

Possibility of defining “Validated by” link constraints between ERM and ETM

See the screenshot "2024-07-09 12_34_01-Window.png". The QM Test Case 364 validate the RM artifacts 45130, 43907, 43390 and 43391 45130 is a "Heading" artifact 43907 is an "Information" artifact 43390 and 43391 are "Requirement" artifacts In our i...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Future consideration

Emptying Trash must not affect Baseline

Emptying trash actually also remove the purged artifacts from Baselines.That means a baseline can be affected years later after its creation by such an action and detection is very difficult since it is incomplete and it is not obvious which artif...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Future consideration

As an Admin, I would like to have Access Control based on each Test Artifact

In a Project Area we can have multiple teams, but not all teams necessarily should have access to everything in the Project Area. If we need to introduce a new team to the Project Area that should not have access to certain Test Artifacts, there i...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.