IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 598 of 7038

    Ability to change the icons for Execution States

    We have some custom icons for out execution states, while we can change the name of the execution states, there is not a way to change the icons used for those states. We would like to request this in order to use our custom icons that make sense ...
    10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 0 Future consideration

    Include Version # in RQM Test Artifacts

    Require to be able to query through REST, OSLC or JRS, a Test Artifact's version.
    almost 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Reporting 1 Not under consideration

    ETM: Multi value select in filter of list views for test artifact Ids by comma separated list

    We would like to be able to specify multiple artefact IDs in the filter box of test artefacts (especially test cases and test scripts) as a comma-separated list to eventually perform a bulk update of the status of the selected artefacts. Use case:...
    over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

    Setting External Variables (Test_Plan, Test_Suite, Test_Case) as Optional in RQM

    Hi, I have 3 external variables: Test_Plan Test_Suite Test_Case Each uses the Configuration Metadata to provide a "Browse ..." button. The user now should only provide exactly ONE and the template than is based on that selection. RQM keeps saying ...
    10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management 2 Future consideration

    Provide Excel output when using a PUB (RPE) report in ETM

    Currently, when we want to generate a document based on a RPE canevas that has been deployed in an ETM ressource, the only available outputs are PDF, Word, HTML, and XSL-FO. It would be very helpful to be able to choose the Excel output, as we can...
    10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Reporting 0 Future consideration

    Include All Tests in a Single Review

    Enhance test review functionality to encapsulate a baseline/snapshot of all of the tests (test cases and scripts) in a single review, with inline comments.
    almost 8 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Not under consideration

    As a user I would like to be able to Merge Streams that has locked artifacts by being prompted to override the lock

    If you try to merge a Stream that has locked artifacts, the merge will fail because the locked items cannot be updated. The solution to that is to unlock the artifact and redo the merge. But if you have several different artifacts that are locked,...
    over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

    "Previous Result Details" in TCER/TSER should modify

    According to test engineers, the name "Previous Result Details" in TCER/TSER will cause mis-understanding, as they only tested once, and ignore this as it is previous result. Better to modify the name in TCER/TSER to avoid mis-leading.
    11 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

    Defect id should be a mandatory input for failed test case in RQM

    Currently there is no request to provide the defect id/problem work item id to one test case in RQM that ends with Failed result. It should be implemented as one improvement for failed test case. Defect id or problem WI need to become a mandatory ...
    over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Documentation 0 Future consideration

    It is needed to see links to different versions of the same identifier at the same time

    Hi, When we clone a TestCase A from component A to have a new TestCase A in component B with all the same properties, including the already created links, the identifier of the TestCase is maintained. However, we have noticed that when we try to r...
    over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Integrations 3 Not under consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.