IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 517

Include in the artefact history the version/baseline information

Current situation: The artefact history does not include any version/baseline information and it is difficult to track modifications based on a version of an artefact; only possible by checking the Modified date. Required situation/Proposal: The a...
12 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

Test Script Traceability with Test Case in approved state

Use Case description : - Add custom workflow with three state in RQM project (Draft, In Review, Approved) - Create a test case (TC1) and set the state to “Approved” (The test case has passed all the technical reviews and can be used. It should not...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Make visible Unique ID that can be assigned in RQM Excel Importer Tool

In RQM, the excel importer tool allows for a unique ID to be imported and assigned to a Test Case while utilizing the command testcase.XLSArtifactID="Value". Do to the way that our project teams work, they have requirements and procedures written ...
almost 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 4 Not under consideration

ETM - Script template setting Change Column display left to right

When working in Test script editor, default display of left to right is not an available option within the template. Setting can only be changed on each script and it is not set as default. This adds additional formatting required for every test s...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

As a Admin, I would like to add a Project Area Property to prevent the Execution Owner to be automatically assigned

Currently, when you add a Test Case to the Test Suite, if the Test Case has an owner assigned, the Test Case automatically sets the Execution Owner to the same user. There is a Project Property that does something similar, but for TCERs and TSERs:...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Formal Review/approval on a testcase need to also update testScript state

Use case : Approval trackings is configured in way like : Approval created/pending : State 0 => State 1 Approval approved : State 1 => State 3 Approval rejected : State 1 => State 4 Testcase and TestScript use same workflow Manually chang...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Show correct "Tested By" user in Test Case Result when running an Automated Test Case

When running an automated Test Case (such as UFT, for example), the "Tested By" section that exists in the Test Case Result will show the user who is registered in the Adapter, instead of the user who is running the test. This information is misle...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

As a User, I would like to be able to automatically/programatically set Attributes and Custom Categories for automated tests

Right now the automated tests need to be manually updated after the result is created, so that the Custom Categories and Attributes are correctly filled. The workaround used is to add to the tests a job that runs after a few seconds after the test...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Bulk unlock Test Cases and Test Scripts.

In 'Engineering Test Management,' we lack the option to unlock multiple Test Cases and Test Scripts in bulk. Consequently, we are required to manually unlock each item, which is time-consuming. The necessity to unlock several Test Cases and Test S...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

As a User, I would like to get the REST URL from the "Copy link for this page" button

Currently, the ETM application already provides the "Copy OSLC URL" button, but in order to get the REST URL you would need to construct it manually (following the documentation) OR export the artifact to PDF and get the URL at the bottom of the p...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.