IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 5785 of 5785

Establish a field like the discussion field also for other elements like review comments

The discussion field is used to document user entries with a specific time stamp. This functionality is also helpful for other use cases, e.g. to store review findings or something else. But unfortunately the discussion field can only be used once...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Work Items 2 Future consideration

Problems during Build Synchronization in RTC Clinet and Jenkins

There are build synchronization inconsistencies Observed in various cases that are confusing to users. Detailed use cases & it's expected results are attached in the file.
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Build 2 Future consideration

Query to retrieve work items where a specific user is not added as approver

We try to get all the work items where a particular user is not added as Approver by creating a query with the conditions as attached. The query has below AND conditions : Status is xxxType is workitemtypeApprovals>Approver>Email> doesnot...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Work Items 1 Future consideration

Inspection Forms Should be able to take a Higher Volume of Questions

We currently have a business case for a Vehicle Inspection that uses the inspection form to create a form that required around 2000 questions and answers in different permutations. Currently the system struggles when creating or amending a from du...
almost 2 years ago in IBM MAS - Mobile 0 Planned for future release

Rhapsody context pattern with parts and values

Hello Team, I'm trying to get the value property and its value using context pattern for parts which are typed with block. Steps to reproduce : 1. Define a block with 2 ValueProperties (Image_1) 2. Define a part of type “block” (Image_2) 3. Assign...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Functionality already exists

Custom attributes for Environments

Environments do not have custom attributes. We would like the same functionality of custom attributes as in the other RQM artifacts like test plans & test cases.
almost 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Unassigned 4 Not under consideration

PreCondition Set in "Require Workitem Approval" does not detect changerequest linked from another EWM server

Expectation: I want to allow delivery of RMM Changeset only when a linked ChangeRequest are Approved Note : ChangeRequest should be part of another EWM Server Problem: Cannot deliver changeset linked to Approved Change Request from another associa...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management 2 Future consideration

Execution variable names in Test Script should not be editable

An old defect was opened and closed as won't fix: https://jazz.net/jazz02/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/37609 We would like to know if the technology today allows that to be implemented. The idea is to prevent Execution Variable...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Unassigned 1 Is a defect

Need to pin the popup selection of Keywords in the entry of the steps of a test

I submit here a problem of ergonomics found during our use of RQM. In the "Edit Test Scripts Inline" view of a Test Case or in the "Manual Steps" view of a Test Script, it is possible to reference keywords. For this purpose, a button is used to di...
almost 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Request for IBR Auto-population in IBM TRIRIGA Accounting calculations

There is no OOTB functionality to auto-populate IBR other than user manual input. This leaves opportunity for user data entry and accounting calculation errors.
about 4 years ago in IBM TRIRIGA Real Estate & Lease Accounting Management 2 Planned for future release

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.