IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

    Showing 37 of 7027

    Need History of ETM project property change for tracking.

    Project team found the project category value were changed by mistake, but not possible to find the history who did this, and what is the previous value to roll back. Need History of ETM project property change to track it.
    2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 0 Future consideration

    Frozen baseline is needed which not updated according to project category/attribute change

    1. Set baseline for previous release.2. Update and delete exist artifact categories3. Check the baseline, the old fixed baseline also have exist artifact categories deleted, and the value of these categories missing. Baseline should be fixed anyti...
    4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 2 Future consideration

    Restrict access at stream level

    Current ETM access regulation is only possible at project level, or at a team level. There should be a way to restrict access at stream level. When we want to restrict users to work/edit only on their respective stream and not the Master stream, t...
    9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 1 Future consideration

    Enhancement Request: Support for Dual Category Structures in ETM Tool

    Current Challenge: Users currently manage multiple relevant categories within their test cases. However, the ETM tool does not support grouping these categories in a centralized or user-defined manner. While an alternative approach—creating a main...
    4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 0 Future consideration

    Include Preventive Maintenance part of the Service Provider Applications

    Make the application Preventive Maintenance part of the Service Provider solution. An application Preventive Maintenance (SP). In this new application it should be possible to associate a PM record to a Customer and apply Customer Agreements and P...
    about 6 years ago in IBM MAS - Service Provider 2 Future consideration

    OSLC links in ETM to DNG shall be gc configuration context sensitive

    Hello dear IBM Team, this idea originates from my support ticket TS016025963 . My request is, that links between an ETM artifact and a DNG artifact are not visible in the ETM GUI if the user is not looking at the data within the proper configurati...
    over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 2 Not under consideration

    Service Provider Labor Pricing Rules -Need an overtime labor rate multiplier that is not tied to Craft Premium Pay Codes

    The Customer Agreement > Price Schedules > Pricing Rules for Labor transactions provides a “Calculate price with premium pay code” flag; however, that flag uses the multiplier tied to the Premium Pay Code associated with the Craft. Customer ...
    over 4 years ago in IBM MAS - Service Provider 1 Planned for future release

    Include category value names in baselines

    Current situation: When creating a baseline, the set category value of an artefact is baselined. However, when changing the name of the category value, the changed value is also displayed in the baseline. Proposal: Include the name of the category...
    over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Configuration Manager 0 Future consideration

    Bill batch Grouping when billing from Work Order Tracking (SP) List View

    Background At Trafikverket there is a demand to have work orders of a certain type to land on a single bill batch. We have solved this by using the field WORKORDER.PLUSPCOSTCENTER and via an Automation script for WO's with a specific Classificatio...
    over 4 years ago in IBM MAS - Service Provider 1 Future consideration

    Impersonating User

    Impersonating user: This user should allow the admin or user with privilege to temporarily become another authenticated user for testing purpose. Impersonation does not require knowing another user's password. When impersonating another user, the ...
    almost 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Service Provider 1 Not under consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.