Consistency on Role permissions for EWM to be in line with other applications

understand that this is working as designed, but there seems to be inconsistency across applications.
The ordering of a user's assigned roles reflects their relative priority. When behavior is configured for multiple roles, the process framework will execute the behavior associated with the user's highest priority role. Priority doesn't affect permissions; the process runtime will allow the user to perform actions granted to any of their assigned roles."For example:-
User A has the roles assigned in this order,
Change Owner
Change Coordinator
Reviewer
EditorUser B has the roles assigned in this order
Change Owner
Change Coordinator
Editor
ReviewerAnd if there is  operational behaviour defined for Reviewer role, which has a pre condition that Summary and Filed Against are read only attributes for Change proposal WI type
Editor role has a pre condition set for Reviewer WI type but not Change proposalUser A wont be able to save Change Proposal WI with summary and filed against modified as the operational behaviour of Reviewer role takes affect as it has high priority over editor role
User B will be able to save Change Proposal WI with summary and filed against as the  operational behaviour of Editor role takes affect as it has high priority over Reviewer rolePermissions set directly on a role actually do not act in priority order - if any role grants permissions, then the user is allowed to do the action. But permissions set on roles via actions and behaviours will only look at the first role and will not fall through. This is the case even if you do not have a behaviour or action set on the role above. It only ever looks at the top role and doesn't even evaluate roles that appear after in the list - leaving a behaviour off doesn't cause it to fall through.
RM project areas allow you to assign permissions on roles by work item (Artifact types) and state. I understand both are different applications, but there is no consistency across applications.

The ask is for EWM to have same consistency for role permissions like ERM